Determinants of surgeon choice in cases of suspected implant rupture following mastectomy or aesthetic breast surgery: Clinical implications. Issue 27 (2nd July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zingaretti, Nicola; Rampino Cordaro, Emanuele; Parodi, Pier Camillo; Marega, Giulia; Modolo, Francesca; Moreschi, Carlo; Da Broi, Ugo
• Other Names: Feigerlova. Eva section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 99:Issue 27(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07-02
• Subjects: breast implant rupture -- breast reconstruction -- informed consent -- malpractice -- medical liability; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021134
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Implant ruptures may be diagnosed by physical examination, ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The absence of standard guidelines to approach to implant ruptures may cause unnecessary surgical revisions in the absence of radiological confirmation of prosthetic damages. The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic procedures applied to patients with suspected prosthetic rupture and surgeon choices to perform a revision or to plan a clinical and radiological follow-up. We conducted a retrospective study on 62 women submitted to revision surgery due to radiological diagnosis of suspected implant rupture, following mastectomy or aesthetic reconstruction, and admitted to a Plastic Surgery Department between 2008 and 2018. Seventy-three implants, believed to be ruptured, were explanted. One-third of these were intact and unnecessarily explanted. US associated with MRI evaluation resulted in the most helpful diagnostical method. A standardized clinical and radiological approach is essential to manage breast implant ruptures successfully. An innovative protocol is proposed in order to: ensure the appropriate management of implant ruptures and prevent unnecessary surgical revisions; reduce the risk of claims for medical malpractice in cases of unsatisfactory final aesthetic results or worse than before. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text