Opportunity and marginal abatement cost savings from China's pilot carbon emissions permit trading system: Simulating evidence from the industrial sectors. (1st October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Opportunity and marginal abatement cost savings from China's pilot carbon emissions permit trading system: Simulating evidence from the industrial sectors. (1st October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Opportunity and marginal abatement cost savings from China's pilot carbon emissions permit trading system: Simulating evidence from the industrial sectors
- Authors:
- Xian, Yujiao
Wang, Ke
Wei, Yi-Ming
Huang, Zhimin - Abstract:
- Abstract: China has launched pilot carbon emissions permit trading schemes (ETS) in seven regions since 2013/2014 and has established a nationwide ETS in the power industry by the end of 2017. Recent literature has evaluated China's seven pilot regions on design aspects of the ETS, and yet little is known about the potential recovery of economic output loss through introducing the ETS. This study considers the recovery of industrial value added loss and thus measures the abatement cost savings from trading to evaluate the necessity and feasibility of China's pilot ETSs. The analysis develops a parametric and nonparametric combined technique to calculate the opportunity abatement cost savings (i.e., potential abatement cost savings and unrealized abatement cost savings) and marginal abatement cost savings (i.e., changes on carbon shadow prices) in China's pilot ETSs during 2011–2015. It additionally provides an estimation of potential carbon emissions reduction from ETS. Both cross-industrial trading and intertemporal trading are considered, and three simulations, defined as no trading, cross-industrial trading, and cross-industrial and intertemporal trading, are conducted. We found that, i) 1–16% potential abatement cost savings and 2–12% unrealized abatement cost savings would be identified in China's pilot ETS regions. ii) 0.5–33% and 1.6–25% carbon emissions reduction potential would be realized respectively by introducing ETS and eliminating the operational inefficiencyAbstract: China has launched pilot carbon emissions permit trading schemes (ETS) in seven regions since 2013/2014 and has established a nationwide ETS in the power industry by the end of 2017. Recent literature has evaluated China's seven pilot regions on design aspects of the ETS, and yet little is known about the potential recovery of economic output loss through introducing the ETS. This study considers the recovery of industrial value added loss and thus measures the abatement cost savings from trading to evaluate the necessity and feasibility of China's pilot ETSs. The analysis develops a parametric and nonparametric combined technique to calculate the opportunity abatement cost savings (i.e., potential abatement cost savings and unrealized abatement cost savings) and marginal abatement cost savings (i.e., changes on carbon shadow prices) in China's pilot ETSs during 2011–2015. It additionally provides an estimation of potential carbon emissions reduction from ETS. Both cross-industrial trading and intertemporal trading are considered, and three simulations, defined as no trading, cross-industrial trading, and cross-industrial and intertemporal trading, are conducted. We found that, i) 1–16% potential abatement cost savings and 2–12% unrealized abatement cost savings would be identified in China's pilot ETS regions. ii) 0.5–33% and 1.6–25% carbon emissions reduction potential would be realized respectively by introducing ETS and eliminating the operational inefficiency of the ETS. iii) Marginal abatement cost savings would both exist in almost all regions if the ETS were implemented and if the ETS were fully operational. Highlights: Abatement cost savings from trading are calculated in China's pilot regions. Potential recovery of economic output loss is identified in industrial sectors. Three simulation analysis of carbon emission permit trading are conducted. CO2 emissions reduction potentials in trading are also identified. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of environmental management. Volume 271(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of environmental management
- Issue:
- Volume 271(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 271, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 271
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0271-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10-01
- Subjects:
- Carbon emissions permit trading -- Carbon shadow prices -- Directional distance function (DDF) -- By-production approach
Environmental policy -- Periodicals
Environmental management -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
363.705 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110975 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.383000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13727.xml