Awareness of HPV and drivers of HPV vaccine uptake among university students: A quantitative, cross‐sectional study. (17th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cocchio, Silvia; Bertoncello, Chiara; Baldovin, Tatjana; Fonzo, Marco; Bennici, Silvia Eugenia; Buja, Alessandra; Majori, Silvia; Baldo, Vincenzo
• Is Part Of: Health & social care in the community. Volume 28:Number 5(2020)
• Page Start: 1514
• Page End: 1524
• Publication Date: 2020-03-17
• Subjects: human papillomavirus -- sexual health awareness -- sexually transmitted infections -- vaccination; Public welfare -- Periodicals; Community health services -- Periodicals; Human services -- Periodicals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12974
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0966-0410

Abstract

Abstract: HPV vaccination is a milestone in primary prevention. However in Italy, vaccine coverage is still nowhere near the target of 95%. We investigated factors associated with inclination to get vaccinated in university students, as they are likely to have just assumed a central role in their healthcare decision‐making. University students aged 18–25 were asked to fill in a questionnaire. The effect of socio‐demographic and behavioural characteristics on HPV awareness was assessed with a logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, nationality, degree course, relationship, age at first intercourse, number of sexual partners, smoking, sexual orientation, past diagnosis of STDs and knowledge of people who had received HPV vaccine. A second regression adjusting also for information sources, awareness and knowledge investigated factors associated with inclination to receive vaccine. Nine thousand nine hundred and eighty‐eight questionnaires were included (response rate 91.3%); awareness of HPV and vaccine was 83.3% and 69.9% respectively. Awareness (AOR: 3.3; 95% CI: 2.3–4.6) and a good knowledge positively affected acceptability, as well as a previous diagnosis of STDs and knowledge of vaccinated people. Healthcare workers (AOR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.4–1.9) and family members (AOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4–2.1) were the most influencing information sources, even if knowledge of vaccinated people was by far more persuasive (AOR: 2.7; 95% CI: 2.2–3.3). Only 12% of participants were acquainted with skin to skin HPV transmission, while 75% believed in a full effectiveness of condom; less than 22% associated HPV with cancer (other than cervical cancer). Efforts to increase awareness are likely to be worth considering that: awareness is the main determinant of vaccine acceptance; only 50% of individuals not interested in receiving vaccine were aware of it; males are much less aware (AOR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.07–0.11). Moreover, this study spotlights some misconceptions around HPV and acknowledges a pivotal role of healthcare workers, family and peer influence.