Estimating prevalence and test accuracy in disease ecology: How Bayesian latent class analysis can boost or bias imperfect test results. Issue 14 (15th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Helman, Sarah K.; Mummah, Riley O.; Gostic, Katelyn M.; Buhnerkempe, Michael G.; Prager, Katherine C.; Lloyd‐Smith, James O.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 10:Issue 14(2020)
• Page Start: 7221
• Page End: 7232
• Publication Date: 2020-06-15
• Subjects: Bayesian latent class -- California sea lion -- diagnostic test -- disease -- infection -- prevalence -- sensitivity -- specificity; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6448
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: Obtaining accurate estimates of disease prevalence is crucial for the monitoring and management of wildlife populations but can be difficult if different diagnostic tests yield conflicting results and if the accuracy of each diagnostic test is unknown. Bayesian latent class analysis (BLCA) modeling offers a potential solution, providing estimates of prevalence levels and diagnostic test accuracy under the realistic assumption that no diagnostic test is perfect. In typical applications of this approach, the specificity of one test is fixed at or close to 100%, allowing the model to simultaneously estimate the sensitivity and specificity of all other tests, in addition to infection prevalence. In wildlife systems, a test with near‐perfect specificity is not always available, so we simulated data to investigate how decreasing this fixed specificity value affects the accuracy of model estimates. We used simulations to explore how the trade‐off between diagnostic test specificity and sensitivity impacts prevalence estimates and found that directional biases depend on pathogen prevalence. Both the precision and accuracy of results depend on the sample size, the diagnostic tests used, and the true infection prevalence, so these factors should be considered when applying BLCA to estimate disease prevalence and diagnostic test accuracy in wildlife systems. A wildlife disease case study, focusing on leptospirosis in California sea lions, demonstrated the potential for Bayesian latent class methods to provide reliable estimates under real‐world conditions. We delineate conditions under which BLCA improves upon the results from a single diagnostic across a range of prevalence levels and sample sizes, demonstrating when this method is preferable for disease ecologists working in a wide variety of pathogen systems. Abstract : Obtaining accurate estimates of disease prevalence is crucial in disease ecology and wildlife population management, but can be difficult if different diagnostic tests yield conflicting results and if the accuracy of each diagnostic test is unknown. Bayesian latent class analysis (BLCA) provides estimates of prevalence levels and diagnostic test accuracy under the realistic assumption that no diagnostic test is perfect. Using simulations and a wildlife case study, we assess how the precision and accuracy of this method are affected by sample sizes, diagnostic test accuracy, and the choice of diagnostic threshold for quantitative assays, and further explore when the method improves upon the results from a single diagnostic test.