Abstracts presented at the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO) Congresses: Publication fate and discrepancies with full‐length articles. Issue 8 (10th June 2020) - Wu, Xinyu
Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the full publication proportion (FPP) of abstracts presented at the 2010 and 2011 EAO Congresses, analyse the discrepancies between abstracts and their full publications, and explore potential predictors of FPP and discrepancies. Methods: Abstracts presented at the 2010 and 2011 EAO Congresses were retrieved. Associated full publications were identified by searching PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar. Discrepancies between abstracts and full publications were identified, classified and evaluated using a discrepancy score. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to describe cumulative FPP over time. Predictors for FPP and the discrepancy score were analysed using cox regression modelling and a linear regression model, respectively. Results: 850 abstracts were included. The overall FPP was 36.4% with a median time lapse of 12 months. Higher FPP were significantly associated with oral presentation (HR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.68–3.22; p < .001), multiple affiliations (HR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.00–1.73; p = .048) and presence of statistical tests (HR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.36–2.32; p < .001). 91.3% pairs had at least one minor change from the abstract, and 70.9% had at least one major change. Greater discrepancy score was significantly associated with longer time lapse ( B = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.04–0.08; p < .001) and being clinical research (B = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.52–2.08; p = .001). Conclusions: Thirty‐six per cent of abstracts presented at the EAO Congresses were published. Among these, more than two‐thirds showed at least one major change in their full publications. Abstracts presented in oral implantology conferences should not be relied upon to inform practice.