Changes in institutional and social–ecological system robustness due to the adoption of large‐scale irrigation technology in Navarre (Spain). (3rd February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Albizua, Amaia; Zaga‐Mendez, Alejandra
• Is Part Of: Environmental policy and governance. Volume 30:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 167
• Page End: 181
• Publication Date: 2020-02-03
• Subjects: institutions -- large‐scale irrigation -- maladaptation -- robustness of social–ecological systems -- technological change; Environmental policy -- Europe -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Europe -- Periodicals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1002/eet.1882
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-932X

Abstract

Abstract: Many regional and national organisations promote the modernisation of agriculture by supporting new technologies to increase their territory's competitiveness in a free‐market context. Such technologies and their associated intensive land management practices are geared towards obtaining higher yields. However, their application also entails changes in water and land management institutions, which could alter interactions among multiple components of the agrarian social–ecological system and potentially weaken the system. Here, we assess how these components and their relations change in a village situated in Navarre (Spain) after the uptake of large‐scale irrigation infrastructure. Specifically, we analyse such changes by comparing how the design principles for robust social–ecological systems manifest before and after the adoption of large‐scale irrigation. Our findings indicate that an unequal distribution of water and land induces some farmers to abandon their agrarian activities. Our case study also shows how irrigation communities have partially lost their autonomy to self‐organise and make agrarian management‐related decisions. We suggest that the adoption of large‐scale irrigation in this region contributes to a decrease in cooperation among resource users, and between users and infrastructure providers. This is due to a decline in the capacity to achieve collective‐choice arrangements and higher external control and monitoring of water use. We argue that the current agrarian management changes may damage social–ecological system robustness and affect the sustainable use of common‐pool resources, leading farmers to maladaptation to climate and market variability.