Why Do Countries Respond Differently to COVID-19? A Comparative Study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan. Issue 6 (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yan, Bo; Zhang, Xiaomin; Wu, Long; Zhu, Heng; Chen, Bin
• Other Names: Holzer Marc guest-editor.; Newbold Stephanie P. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: American review of public administration. Volume 50:Issue 6/7(2020)
• Page Start: 762
• Page End: 769
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- institutional arrangements -- cultural orientation -- response strategy; Public administration -- Periodicals; Public administration -- United States -- Periodicals; 351
• DOI: 10.1177/0275074020942445
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0275-0740

Abstract

Nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are important public health tools to fight against COVID-19. Governments around the world have instituted a variety of NPIs to modify individuals' behavior, giving rise to four distinct pandemic response strategies: nudge, mandate, decree, and boost. To better understand the different policy choices involved in these strategies, four countries including Sweden, China, France, and Japan were compared to identify the critical institutional and cultural determinants of national response strategy. The finding shows that various responses regarding same threat are dependent on the distinctive institutional arrangements and cultural orientation of each country, and thus, there is no One-Size-Fits-All strategy.