Role of fatigue in damage development of refractories under thermal shock loads of different intensity. Issue 13 (September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andreev, K.; Luchini, B.; Rodrigues, M.J.; Alves, J. Lino
• Is Part Of: Ceramics international. Volume 46:Issue 13(2020)
• Page Start: 20707
• Page End: 20716
• Publication Date: 2020-09
• Subjects: Thermal shock -- Silica refractories -- Damage accumulation -- FEM modelling -- Ultrasound velocity; Ceramics -- Periodicals; Céramique industrielle -- Périodiques; Ceramics; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 666
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.235
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0272-8842

Abstract

Abstract: Refractories insulation of industrial furnaces often fail under repetitive thermal shock. Degradation of silica refractories under thermal shock loads of different intensity was studied. The load variation was achieved by utilisation of geometrically similar samples of different dimensions. Finite element method modelling predicted loads developing during the test. Resulting damage was determined by the ultrasound velocity and crack patterns. Tests involving up to 150 cycles demonstrated the role of fatigue in enabling sub-critical crack formation and countering the crack arrest. Repetitive cycles reduce crack wake friction and intensify loading due to crack debris re-location. Damage saturation, sigmoidal and near-exponential damage growth was typical for low, intermediate and high loads, respectively. Similar trends of damage accumulation were observed in mechanical displacement controlled cyclic fatigue tests performed in wedge splitting set-up. Strain and strain energy based criteria of thermal shock intensity seem to have complimentary value in predicting the crack formation and growth. Thermal shock damage after the first cycle seems to be an effective parameter to predict overall resistance to the degradation in the sample. Load reduction due to previous crack formation related to the fatigue potential for subsequent crack development can explain the crack size variation typically observed in refractories after multiple thermal shocks. For thermal shock tests, the variation of sample size, instead of the temperature interval, is a suitable alternative for refractories with strongly temperature dependant material properties.