Economic costs of heat-induced reductions in worker productivity due to global warming. (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Orlov, Anton; Sillmann, Jana; Aunan, Kristin; Kjellstrom, Tord; Aaheim, Asbjørn
• Is Part Of: Global environmental change. Volume 63(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: Heat stress -- Worker productivity -- Cost -- CGE model; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Human ecology -- Periodicals; Nature -- Effect of human beings on -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Écologie humaine -- Périodiques; Homme -- Influence sur la nature -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Human ecology; Nature -- Effect of human beings on; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102087
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-3780

Abstract

Highlights: Mechanisation of outdoor work reduces economic costs of heat stress. Using the Hothaps function leads to lower costs than using the ISO standards. Under RCP8.5 by 2100, global GDP declines by 1.4% due to heat stress. Under RCP2.6 by 2100, global GDP declines by 0.5% due to heat stress. Large part of mitigation costs can be offset by avoiding heat stress impacts. Abstract: We assess economic costs of heat-induced reductions in worker productivity at global scale under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5. Losses in worker productivity are calculated by using an empirically estimated epidemiological exposure-response function, and the associated economic costs are assessed by using a dynamic multi-region, multi-sector computable general equilibrium model. Autonomous mechanisation of outdoor work in agriculture and construction is implemented in the model. We find that under RCP8.5 by 2100, heat-induced reductions in worker productivity result in an average decline of 1.4% in global gross domestic product (GDP) relative to the reference scenario with no climate change. This is approximately 0.4 percentage points less than when no autonomous mechanisation is assumed. For comparison, measuring the economic costs using occupational health and safety recommendations leads to a 2.4% reduction in global GDP, which is substantially larger than when the epidemiological exposure-response function is used. Countries of Africa, South-East Asia, and South Asia are the worst affected by heat stress. However, economic costs could be substantially alleviated if a 2°C global warming target is achieved. Under RCP2.6, the average reduction in global GDP is only 0.5%. A large fraction of global mitigation costs of achieving the 2°C global warming target could be offset by the avoided adverse impacts of heat stress on worker productivity at higher warming levels.