A critical introduction to The Nightingale: gender, race and troubled histories on screen. Issue 1 (2nd January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Arrow, Michelle; Findlay, James
• Is Part Of: Studies in Australasian cinema. Volume 14:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 3
• Page End: 14
• Publication Date: 2020-01-02
• Subjects: Australian film -- Australian history -- settler-colonial studies -- history wars; Motion pictures -- Australasia -- Periodicals; Motion pictures -- Australia -- Periodicals; Motion pictures -- New Zealand -- Periodicals; Motion picture industry -- Australia -- Periodicals; Motion picture industry; Motion pictures; Australasia; Australia; New Zealand; Periodicals; 791.43099
• DOI: 10.1080/17503175.2020.1740404
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1750-3183

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Acclaimed Australian filmmaker Jennifer Kent's film The Nightingale has generated intense debate since its premiere at the 2018 Venice Film Festival. Set during the Black War in Van Diemen's Land in 1825, the film is an unflinching depiction of colonial and sexual violence. Kent told The Saturday Paper that she 'wanted to tell a story that is relevant to my history and my country'. Her vision of British colonisation, and its consequences for those caught in its wake, taps into a conversation with a strong presence in Australia's public, political and cultural life over the last three decades. This article critically introduces The Nightingale as an historical film; that is, a film set in the past which offers an interpretation of history. We ask: how does The Nightingale represent the past? How might we situate it within longer traditions of historical representation of frontier conflict, and the convict experience? How did audiences respond to the film? And finally, how might we situate The Nightingale in the moment of its reception? What does it mean to make a film about colonial violence at the same moment as the Uluru statement called for truth-telling about our history?