Hegel and the history of idealism. Issue 3 (3rd May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beiser, Frederick
• Is Part Of: British journal for the history of philosophy. Volume 28:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 501
• Page End: 513
• Publication Date: 2020-05-03
• Subjects: Hegel -- German idealism -- objective idealism -- subjective idealism; Philosophy -- History -- Periodicals; 109
• DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2019.1661828
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-8788

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article attempts to expose an unwarranted narrowness in the study of idealism in nineteenth century philosophy, and to show that the field of idealism is much wider than usually assumed. This narrowness stems from the influence of Hegel's history of philosophy, which saw the idealist tradition as beginning in Kant, passing through Fichte and Schelling, and then culminating in his own system. This conception of history has been disseminated by Hegel's followers and still prevails today. I argue that this conception is too narrow for several reasons. First, it ignores the romantic idealists (Hölderlin, Novalis, Schlegel); second, it excludes the opposing tradition of idealism of Herbart, Fries and Beneke, which affirmed (against Schelling and Hegel) transcendental idealism, an empiricist epistemology, the existence of the thing-in-itself and the value of the Kantian dualisms; and, third, it neglects the history of idealism after Hegel later in the nineteenth century, more specifically, the idealism of Trendelenburg, Lotze and Hartmann.