New Evidence Pertaining to an Alleged Hopewell Mobiliary Clay Human Figurine: A Reply to Bebber and Colleagues. Issue 2 (3rd May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Everhart, Timothy D.; Biehl, Stephen M.
• Is Part Of: Midcontinental journal of archaeology. Volume 45:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 87
• Page End: 101
• Publication Date: 2020-05-03
• Subjects: Human Figurine -- Thermoluminescence Dating -- Hopewell -- Archival research; Indians of North America -- Antiquities -- Periodicals; United States -- Antiquities -- Periodicals; 977
• DOI: 10.1080/01461109.2020.1743548
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-1109

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Additional information has been identified concerning a fired-clay human figurine analyzed and reported by Bebber and colleagues (2018). Despite this figurine having been discovered within a box labeled "Hopewell Figurine—Hopeton Earthworks, " they argue against a Hopewellian affiliation based on Thermoluminescence (TL) dating, a comparative study, and the inability to firmly establish the specimen's provenience. A rediscovered letter from Olaf Prufer offers a new site of origin and a more complete chain of custody, which is partially corroborated by photographs curated at the Ohio History Connection and a 1925 Boston Evening Transcript article. With this new information, we dispute Bebber and colleagues' (2018) interpretation of the figurine's acquisition, its alleged site of origin, and the conclusions of their comparative analysis. This case study does not support their call for more rigorous authentication of collector-acquired objects; rather, it documents the difficulty in reestablishing the provenience of objects once they have become disassociated.