Affirmation and Majority Students: Does Affirmation Impair Academic Performance in White Males?. Issue 3 (3rd May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jones, Eduardo O.; Huey, Stanley J.
• Is Part Of: Basic and applied social psychology. Volume 42:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 176
• Page End: 191
• Publication Date: 2020-05-03
• Subjects: Social psychology -- Periodicals; 302.05
• DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1732389
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0197-3533

Abstract

Abstract: Self-affirmation is a promising brief intervention for reducing the academic achievement gap between majority and stigmatized groups (e.g., underrepresented minorities, women in STEM fields). Affirmations are thought to improve academic performance among stigmatized groups by expanding one's sense of self, buffering social belonging, and reducing social identity threat. Despite encouraging results, some studies suggest that affirmations may inadvertently decrease the academic performance of nonthreatened White students. We conducted experimental studies to evaluate whether an affirmation focused on the theme of social belonging (i.e., belonging-affirmation) decreased the math performance of White males. We hypothesized that the belonging-affirmation would enhance performance for female participants but diminish math performance for White male participants. Two studies were conducted to evaluate these hypotheses: (1) a lab-based study involving 122 White male and mixed-ethnicity female undergraduates, and (2) an online study involving 197 young adult White males and females. Results failed to support study hypotheses, with no substantive differences in math performance found between male and female participants randomized to a belonging-affirmation versus neutral writing control. These findings are consistent with recent large-scale field replication failures of self-affirmation interventions, indicating that the phenomena may be more nuanced and fragile than suggested by early research findings.