Measurement properties of performance-based instruments to assess mental function during activity and participation in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. (2nd April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kristensen, Lola Qvist; Muren, Marie Almkvist; Petersen, Annemette Krintel; van Tulder, Maurits W.; Gregersen Oestergaard, Lisa
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy. Volume 27:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 168
• Page End: 183
• Publication Date: 2020-04-02
• Subjects: Brain injury -- cognitive impairment -- psychometric properties -- ecological validity -- validity -- reliability -- rehabilitation; Occupational therapy -- Periodicals; 615.8515
• DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1689291
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1103-8128

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Performance-based measures that focus primarily on the ability to engage in ADL are routinely used by occupational therapists to assess a client's cognitive abilities. Objective: To perform a systematic review to investigate measurement properties of performance-based instruments to assess mental function during activity and participation in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Material and methods: Pubmed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and OTseeker were searched. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health measurement instruments checklist was used to evaluate methodological quality of each included study. The quality criteria adapted by Terwee were applied to extract the results of each measurement property followed by a best evidence synthesis. Results: Twenty-eight articles, including 40 ratings of measurement properties, were included. The combination of the Functional Independence Measure and the Functional Assessment Measure showed moderate evidence of good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.99), but conflicting evidence of reliability (ICC 0.83) and poor evidence of construct validity. All other instruments showed limited or unknown evidence. Conclusions: This review provides an overview of measurement properties of performance-based instruments and contributes to such methodological considerations before choosing an instrument. Though, the results reveal a lack of high-quality evidence for any of the measurement properties, it is recommended to use tools with the highest possible evidence for positive ratings. Significance: This review contributes with psychometric evidence on instruments to use in occupational therapy practice and research.