Areca Nut and Betel Quid Control Interventions: Halting the Epidemic. (1st June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Das, Anita; Orlan, Elizabeth; Duncan, Kalina; Thomas, Heather; Ndumele, Amara; Ilbawi, Andre; Parascandola, Mark
• Is Part Of: Substance use & misuse. Volume 55:Number 9(2020)
• Page Start: 1552
• Page End: 1559
• Publication Date: 2020-06-01
• Subjects: Areca nut -- betel quid -- oral cancer -- policy -- intervention -- ban -- media -- campaign -- education -- cessation -- taxation; Narcotic habit -- Periodicals; Alcoholism -- Periodicals; Substance abuse -- Periodicals; Behavior, Addictive -- Periodicals; Sustance-Related Disorders -- Periodicals; 362.2905
• DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1686022
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1082-6084

Abstract

Abstract: Background : Areca nut (AN) and betel quid (BQ) are classified as Group 1 carcinogens. There are approximately 600 million AN/BQ users globally; the majority of users live in the Asia-Pacific region which, correspondingly, has the highest rates of oral cancer. Despite significant disease burden associated with AN/BQ use, there have been no systematic reviews of interventions to reduce product use. Objectives : To analyze interventions that prevent use of AN/BQ, present a basis for a future systematic review on the topic, and provide decision makers with examples of strategies that have demonstrated reduced AN/BQ use. Methods : To identify publications, we searched the literature using terms for AN/BQ and related synonyms in three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Interventions that prevent AN/BQ use, that are published in English and that provide original data analysis, were included in this review. Interventions focused primarily on disease outcomes e.g. oral cancers (secondary prevention) were excluded. Results : Our search revealed 21 interventions targeting AN/BQ use between 1990 and 2018. Strategies include product bans, media campaigns, education, cessation, and taxation at individual and population levels, with varying evidence of impact. While these studies yielded some novel and promising findings, particularly regarding the impact of product bans, mass media campaigns, and cessation interventions, research on interventions specific to AN/BQ use remains limited. Conclusions : We have assessed published interventions that reduce AN/BQ use and identified future research priorities. These findings can be used to develop evidence-based interventions and help guide policymakers in implementing evidence-based policy to regulate these products.