Increased stressful impact among general population in mainland China amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide cross-sectional study conducted after Wuhan city's travel ban was lifted. (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ma, Zheng Feei; Zhang, Yutong; Luo, Xiaoqin; Li, Xinli; Li, Yeshan; Liu, Shuchang; Zhang, Yingfei
• Is Part Of: International journal of social psychiatry. Volume 66:Number 8(2020)
• Page Start: 770
• Page End: 779
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Coronavirus -- COVID-19 -- mental health -- lifestyle changes -- China; Social psychiatry -- Periodicals; 362.205
• DOI: 10.1177/0020764020935489
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7640

Abstract

Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological responses and lifestyle changes among the general population in mainland China following the re-opening of the Wuhan city. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in April 2020. Participants of Chinese nationality aged ⩾ 18 years were asked to complete a modified validated Chinese version of a questionnaire regarding the impact of event scale (IES), family and social support, mental health–related lifestyle changes, and indicators of negative mental health impacts. Results: A total of 728 participants (i.e., 217 males and 511 females) completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the participants was 32.9 ± 10.4 years, with a majority of them (92.2%) having a higher educational qualification level. The overall mean IES in participants was 21.5 ± 7.0, reflecting mild stressful impact (i.e., following the re-opening of the Wuhan city); 25.5% of the participants had an IES score ⩾ 26. Being females and married were significantly associated with a higher mean IES score. The overall mean scores for intrusion and avoidance score scales in participants were 9.4 ± 3.7 and 12.1 ± 4.2, respectively. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased stressful impact in our participants following the re-opening of the Wuhan city when compared with our previous study, which should not be taken lightly.