Impact of the spatial density of weather stations on the performance of distributed and lumped hydrological models. Issue 2 (2nd April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martel, Jean-Luc; Brissette, François; Poulin, Annie
• Is Part Of: Canadian water resources journal =. Volume 45:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 158
• Page End: 171
• Publication Date: 2020-04-02
• Subjects: Hydrological modelling -- lumped model -- distributed model -- regional climate model; Modélisation hydrologique -- modèle global -- modèle distribué -- modèle régional du climat; Water resources development -- Canada -- Periodicals; Water conservation -- Canada -- Periodicals; 333.9100971
• DOI: 10.1080/07011784.2020.1729241
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0701-1784

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to quantify the ability of distributed and lumped hydrological models to use high-resolution precipitation and temperature data to improve streamflow simulation at watershed outlets. To that end, a 40-year, high-resolution, spatially distributed, meteorological dataset was extracted from a 15-km resolution regional climate model simulation (from the Canadian Regional Climate Model – CRCM v.4.2.4 driven by ERA40 reanalysis). This dataset was used to feed one distributed and four lumped hydrological models. The five models were calibrated on 192 watersheds located in the province of Quebec (Canada) using five different meteorological network densities of pseudo-stations. These densities ranged from one single station (located at the centre of gravity of the watershed) up to the maximum grid density of 1 station per 225 km 2 (15 km × 15 km which corresponds to the CRCM spatial resolution). No significant decrease in validation performance for both types of hydrological models was observed when using any of the tested station densities. Similar results were also obtained when investigating the subsets of 54 smaller (≤2, 500 km 2 ) and 84 medium-sized (2, 500 < area <10, 000 km 2 ) watersheds. However, for the 54 larger watersheds (≥10, 000 km 2 ), the decrease in performance was statistically significant for the distributed model when using one single station. While all lumped models showed a noticeable drop in performance only when using a single station, the distributed model was the only model to show a gradual decrease in performance as the network density decreased. These results indicate that when dealing with large watersheds, distributed models could benefit up to some extent from a larger meteorological network density. These conclusions are likely to be relevant to Canadian watersheds with similar physiographic characteristics and hydroclimatic conditions as the ones included in the Quebec database that was studied.