Design of mechanical heterogeneous specimens using topology optimization. (1st September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barroqueiro, B.; Andrade-Campos, A.; Dias-de-Oliveira, João; Valente, R.A.F.
• Is Part Of: International journal of mechanical sciences. Volume 181(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-09-01
• Subjects: Topology optimization -- Heterogeneous specimen -- Specimen design -- Tensile loading; Mechanical engineering -- Periodicals; Génie mécanique -- Périodiques; Mechanical engineering; Maschinenbau; Mechanik; Zeitschrift; Periodicals; 621.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105764
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7403

Abstract

Highlights: Heterogeneous specimens are designed using an indirect Topology Optimization (TO) algorithm. A quantitative indicator is proposed to evaluate and rank the heterogeneity of the strain and stress states. For wide applicability, using universal testing machines (UTM), several designs of heterogenous specimen are presented considering tensile loading conditions. Validation is made in both elasticity and plasticity regimes. Graphical abstract: Abstract: Nowadays, the development and design of new parts require an increasing knowledge of the materials' behaviour. Additionally, for the current sophisticated numerical modeling tools, accurate material characterization is critical for the correct calibration of their constitutive models. The constitutive behaviour of a material can be characterized via macroscopic mechanical tests. However, the full material characterization is expensive due to a large number of required tests. Therefore, there is a need to reduce the number of tests by increasing (quantitatively and qualitatively) the information available on a single test. To this end, heterogeneous strain field specimens can provide an answer. In the scope of this work, an innovative numerical methodology to design heterogeneous specimens using Topology Optimization (TO) is presented, together with its formulation and implementation. Numerous designs are presented and assessed through a performance indicator that evaluates the uniformity of the equivalent stress maps and the presence of various stress states (tension, compression and shear) in the specimen. Finally, the most adequate design is redrawn, analyzed and evaluated in an elastoplasticity framework. Validation of the test is also made by comparison.