Land management and climate change determine second‐generation bioenergy potential of the US Northern Great Plains. Issue 7 (13th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dolan, Katelyn A.; Stoy, Paul C.; Poulter, Benjamin
• Is Part Of: Global change biology. Volume 12:Issue 7(2020)
• Page Start: 491
• Page End: 509
• Publication Date: 2020-05-13
• Subjects: bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) -- climate change -- land use and land‐cover change -- negative emission technologies -- switchgrass; Biomass energy -- Periodicals; Biomass energy -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Energy crops -- Periodicals; 662.88
• DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12686
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-1693

Abstract

Abstract: Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) has been proposed as a potential climate mitigation strategy raising concerns over trade‐offs with existing ecosystem services. We evaluate the feasibility of BECCS in the Upper Missouri River Basin (UMRB), a landscape with diverse land use, ownership, and bioenergy potential. We develop land‐use change scenarios and a switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) crop functional type to use in a land‐surface model to simulate second‐generation bioenergy production. By the end of this century, average annual switchgrass production over the UMRB ranges from 60 to 210 Tg dry mass/year and is dependent on the Representative Concentration Pathway for greenhouse gas emissions and on land‐use change assumptions. Under our simple phase‐in assumptions this results in a cumulative total production of 2, 000–6, 000 Tg C over the study period with the upper estimates only possible in the absence of climate change. Switchgrass yields decreased as average CO2 concentrations and temperatures increased, suggesting the effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 was small because of its C4 photosynthetic pathway. By the end of the 21st century, the potential energy stored annually in harvested switchgrass averaged between 1 and 4 EJ/year assuming perfect conversion efficiency, or an annual electrical generation capacity of 7, 000–28, 000 MW assuming current bioenergy efficiency rates. Trade‐offs between bioenergy and ecosystem services were identified, including cumulative direct losses of 1, 000–2, 600 Tg C stored in natural ecosystems from land‐use change by 2090. Total cumulative losses of ecosystem carbon stocks were higher than the potential ~300 Tg C in fossil fuel emissions from the single largest power plant in the region over the same time period, and equivalent to potential carbon removal from the atmosphere from using biofuels grown in the same region. Numerous trade‐offs from BECCS expansion in the UMRB must be balanced against the potential benefits of a carbon‐negative energy system. Abstract : Fractional land available for switchgrass bioenergy planting under three different land management considerations ( Conservation [ C ] – upper left, Aggressive [ A ] – bottom left, Aggressive with Pasture [ AP ] – bottom right) with the Upper Missouri River Basin (UMRB) study domain outlined in red. A corresponding time series (upper right) shows simulated land area in the UMRB of four land management classes for LPJmL between 1901 and 2100.