Failure mode classification and bearing capacity prediction for reinforced concrete columns based on ensemble machine learning algorithm. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Feng, De-Cheng; Liu, Zhen-Tao; Wang, Xiao-Dan; Jiang, Zhong-Ming; Liang, Shi-Xue
• Is Part Of: Advanced engineering informatics. Volume 45(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: Machine learning -- Ensemble learning -- Adaptive boosting -- Classification -- Regression -- Reinforced concrete -- Column -- Flexure -- Shear; Computer-aided engineering -- Periodicals; Engineering -- Data processing -- Periodicals; 620.00285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1474-0346

Abstract

Abstract: Failure mode (FM) and bearing capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns are key concerns in structural design and/or performance assessment procedures. The failure types, i.e., flexure, shear, or mix of the above two, will greatly affect the capacity and ductility of the structure. Meanwhile, the design methodologies for structures of different failure types will be totally different. Therefore, developing efficient and reliable methods to identify the FM and predict the corresponding capacity is of special importance for structural design/assessment management. In this paper, an intelligent approach is presented for FM classification and bearing capacity prediction of RC columns based on the ensemble machine learning techniques. The most typical ensemble learning method, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) algorithm, is adopted for both classification and regression (prediction) problems. Totally 254 cyclic loading tests of RC columns are collected. The geometric dimensions, reinforcing details, material properties are set as the input variables, while the failure types (for classification problem) and peak capacity forces (for regression problem) are set as the output variables. The results indicate that the model generated by the AdaBoost learning algorithm has a very high accuracy for both FM classification (accuracy = 0.96) and capacity prediction (R 2 = 0.98). Different learning algorithms are also compared and the results show that ensemble learning (especially AdaBoost) has better performance than single learning. In addition, the bearing capacity predicted by the AdaBoost is also compared to that by the empirical formulas provided by the design codes, which shows an obvious superior of the proposed method. In summary, the machine learning technique, especially the ensemble learning, can provide an alternate to the conventional mechanics-driven models in structural design in this big data time.