Malaria infection prevalence and sensitivity of reactive case detection in Zanzibar. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stuck, Logan; Fakih, Bakar S.; Al-mafazy, Abdul-wahid H.; Hofmann, Natalie E.; Holzschuh, Aurel; Grossenbacher, Benjamin; Bennett, Adam; Cotter, Chris; Reaves, Erik; Ali, Abdullah; der Horst, Tina van; Felger, Ingrid; Hetzel, Manuel W.; Yukich, Joshua
• Is Part Of: International journal of infectious diseases. Volume 97(2020)
• Page Start: 337
• Page End: 346
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: malaria -- surveillance -- elimination -- reactive case detection -- focal mass drug administration -- RCD -- fMDA; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals; Communicable diseases; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1201-9712

Abstract

Highlights: Malaria infection prevalence is higher in households of passively detected cases Rapid diagnostic test sensitivity in reactive case detection in Zanzibar is exceedingly poor Households of imported cases are much more likely to contain malaria infections Abstract: Background: Reactive case detection (RCD) is a commonly used strategy for malaria surveillance and response in elimination settings. Many approaches to RCD assume detectable infections are clustered within and around homes of passively detected cases (index households), which has been evaluated in a number of settings with disparate results. Methods: Household questionnaires and diagnostic testing were conducted following RCD investigations in Zanzibar, Tanzania, including the index household and up to 9 additional neighboring households. Results: Of 12, 487 participants tested by malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT), 3·2% of those residing in index households and 0·4% of those residing in non-index households tested positive (OR = 8·4; 95%CI: 5·7, 12·5). Of 6, 281 participants tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), 8·4% of those residing in index households and 1·3% of those residing in non-index households tested positive (OR = 7·1; 95%CI: 6·1, 10·9). Within households of index cases defined as imported, odds of qPCR-positivity amongst members reporting recent travel were 1·4 times higher than among those without travel history (95%CI: 0·2, 4·4). Amongst non-index households, odds of qPCR-detectable infection were no different between households located within 50 m of the index household as compared with those located farther away (OR = 0·8, 95%CI: 0·5, 1·4). Sensitivity of RDT to detect qPCR-detectable infections was 34% (95%CI: 26·4, 42·3). Conclusions: Malaria prevalence in index households in Zanzibar is much higher than in non-index households, in which prevalence is very low. Travelers represent a high-risk population. Low sensitivity of RDTs due to a high prevalence of low-density infections results in an RCD system missing a large proportion of the parasite reservoir.