Front-of-neck airway rescue with impalpable anatomy during a simulated cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate scenario: scalpel–finger–cannula versus scalpel–finger–bougie in a sheep model. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heard, Andrew; Gordon, Helen; Douglas, Scott; Grainger, Nicholas; Avis, Hans; Vlaskovsky, Philip; Toner, Andrew
• Is Part Of: British journal of anaesthesia. Volume 125:Number 2(2020)
• Page Start: 184
• Page End: 191
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: airway management -- cannot intubate cannot oxygenate -- emergency front-of-neck airway -- oxygen delivery -- scalpel finger bougie -- scalpel finger cannula; Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.9605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.067
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-0912

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Front-of-neck airway rescue in a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate (CICO) scenario with impalpable anatomy is particularly challenging. Several techniques have been described based on a midline vertical neck incision with subsequent finger dissection, followed by either a cannula or scalpel puncture of the now palpated airway. We explored whether the speed of rescue oxygenation differs between these techniques. Methods: In a high-fidelity simulation of a CICO scenario in anaesthetised Merino sheep with impalpable front-of-neck anatomy, 35 consecutive eligible participants undergoing airway training performed scalpel–finger–cannula and scalpel–finger–bougie in a random order. The primary outcome was time from airway palpation to first oxygen delivery. Data, were analysed with Cox proportional hazards. Results: Scalpel–finger–cannula was associated with shorter time to first oxygen delivery on univariate (hazard ratio [HR]=11.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.14–25.13; P <0.001) and multivariate (HR=8.87; 95% CI, 4.31–18.18; P <0.001) analyses. In the multivariable model, consultant grade was also associated with quicker first oxygen delivery compared with registrar grade (HR=3.28; 95% CI, 1.36–7.95; P =0.008). With scalpel–finger–cannula, successful oxygen delivery within 3 min of CICO declaration and ≤2 attempts was more frequent; 97% vs 63%, P <0.001. In analyses of successful cases only, scalpel–finger–cannula resulted in earlier improvement in arterial oxygen saturations (–25 s; 95% CI, –35 to –15; P <0.001), but a longer time to first capnography reading (+89 s; 95% CI, 69 to 110; P <0.001). No major complications occurred in either arm. Conclusions: The scalpel–finger–cannula technique was associated with superior oxygen delivery performance during a simulated CICO scenario in sheep with impalpable front-of-neck anatomy.