LET response variability of GafchromicTM EBT3 film from a 60Co calibration in clinical proton beam qualities. Issue 6 (23rd March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smith, Blake R.; Pankuch, Mark; Hammer, Clifford G.; DeWerd, Larry A.; Culberson, Wesley S.
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 46:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 2716
• Page End: 2728
• Publication Date: 2019-03-23
• Subjects: EBT3 film dosimetry -- LET dependence -- proton dosimetry; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.13442
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: To establish a method of accurate dosimetry required to quantify the expected linear energy transfer (LET) quenching effect of EBT3 film used to benchmark the dose distribution for a given treatment field and specified measurement depth. In order to facilitate this technique, a full analysis of film calibration which considers LET variability at the plane of measurement and as a function of proton beam quality is demonstrated. Additionally, the corresponding uncertainty from the process was quantified for several measurement scenarios. Materials and methods: The net change in optical density (OD) from a single version of Gafchromic TM EBT3 film was measured using an Epson flatbed scanner and NIST‐traceable OD filters. Film OD response was characterized with respect to the known dose to water at the point of measurement for both a NIST‐traceable 60 Co beam at the UWADCL and several clinical single‐energy and spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) proton beam qualities at the Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center. Increasing proton LET environments were acquired by placing film at increasing depths of Gammex HE Solid Water® whose water‐equivalent thickness was characterized prior to measurement. Results: A strong LET dependence was observed near the Bragg peak (BP) consistent with previous studies performed with earlier versions of EBT3 film. The influence of range straggling on the film's LET response appears to have a uniform effect toward the BP regardless of the nominal beam energy. Proximal to this depth, the film's response decreased with decreasing energy at the same dose‐average LET. The opposite trend was observed for depths past the BP. Changes in the SOBP energy modulation showed a linear relationship between the film's relative response and dose‐averaged LET. Relative effectiveness factors (RE) were observed to range between 2%–7% depending on the width of the SOBP and depth of the film. Using the field‐specific calibration technique, a total k = 1 uncertainty in the absorbed dose to water was estimated to range from 4.68%–5.21%. Conclusion: While EBT3 film's strong LET dependence is a common problem in proton beam dosimetry, this work has shown that the LET dependence can be taken into account by carefully considering the depth and energy modulation across the film using field‐specific corrections. RE factors were determined with a combined k = 1 uncertainty of 3.57% for SOBP environments and between 3.17%–4.69% for uniform, monoenergetic fields proximal to the distal 80% of the BP. Abstract :