Nipple malposition after bilateral nipple‐sparing mastectomy with implant‐based reconstruction: Objective postoperative analysis utilizing BCCT.core computer software. Issue 7 (10th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hart, Alexandra; Doyle, Kathleen; Losken, Albert; Carlson, Grant W.
• Is Part Of: Breast journal. Volume 26:Issue 7(2020)
• Page Start: 1270
• Page End: 1275
• Publication Date: 2020-01-10
• Subjects: breast reconstruction -- implant reconstruction -- nipple sparing -- objective analysis -- patient outcomes; Breast -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Breast -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 618.19
• DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13699
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1075-122X

Abstract

Abstract: Nipple‐sparing mastectomies (NSMs) are accepted as safe oncologic procedures for select patient populations, but objective evaluation of aesthetic outcomes has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study was to utilize BCCT.core computer software to objectively evaluate NAC malposition following bilateral NSM with implant reconstruction and compare the analysis to an expert panel. Postoperative photographs of 43 patients who underwent bilateral NSM were analyzed with the BCCT.core and by an expert panel of plastic surgery residents and attendings. The panel was asked to only evaluate nipple asymmetry and position. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine interrater reliability (n = 12) and between expert panel ratings and BCCT.core ratings. Statistics were performed using SPSS statistical package version 24.0. The ICC for the expert panel interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.941, 95% CI: 0.912‐0.964). The analysis between BCCT.core individual parameters, specifically the breast retraction assessment (ie, BRA score = the difference in nipple position between the two breasts assessing breast symmetry) and expert panel, showed statistically significant positive correlation. The parameters provided by the BCCT.core software were correlated with both the mean expert panel rating and BCCT.core ratings. Therefore, it is plausible that BCCT.core parameters could be used to objectively quantify NAC malposition/asymmetry and guide treatment in patients undergoing bilateral NSM with implant reconstruction.