Comparative modeling of the disregistry and Peierls stress for dissociated edge and screw dislocations in Al. (June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative modeling of the disregistry and Peierls stress for dissociated edge and screw dislocations in Al. (June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparative modeling of the disregistry and Peierls stress for dissociated edge and screw dislocations in Al
- Authors:
- Xu, Shuozhi
Mianroodi, Jaber R.
Hunter, Abigail
Svendsen, Bob
Beyerlein, Irene J. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Many elementary deformation processes in metals involve the motion of dislocations. The planes of glide and specific processes dislocations prefer depend heavily on their atomic core structures. Atomistic simulations are desirable for dislocation modeling but their application to even sub-micron scale problems is in general computationally costly. Accordingly, continuum-based approaches, such as the phase-field microelasticity, phase-field dislocation dynamics (PFDD), generalized Peierls–Nabarro (GPN) models, and the concurrent atomistic–continuum (CAC) method, have attracted increasing attention in the field of dislocation modeling because they well represent both short-range cores interactions and long-range stress fields of dislocations. To better understand their similarities and differences, it is useful to compare these methods in the context of benchmark simulations and predictions. In this paper, we apply the CAC method and different PFDD variants – one of them is equivalent to a GPN model – to simulate an extended (i.e., dissociated) dislocation in Al with initially pure edge or pure screw character in terms of the disregistry. CAC and discrete forms of PFDD are also employed to calculate the Peierls stress. By conducting comprehensive convergence studies, we quantify the dependence of these measures on time/grid resolution and simulation cell size. Several important but often overlooked differences between PFDD/GPN variants are clarified. Our work shedsAbstract: Many elementary deformation processes in metals involve the motion of dislocations. The planes of glide and specific processes dislocations prefer depend heavily on their atomic core structures. Atomistic simulations are desirable for dislocation modeling but their application to even sub-micron scale problems is in general computationally costly. Accordingly, continuum-based approaches, such as the phase-field microelasticity, phase-field dislocation dynamics (PFDD), generalized Peierls–Nabarro (GPN) models, and the concurrent atomistic–continuum (CAC) method, have attracted increasing attention in the field of dislocation modeling because they well represent both short-range cores interactions and long-range stress fields of dislocations. To better understand their similarities and differences, it is useful to compare these methods in the context of benchmark simulations and predictions. In this paper, we apply the CAC method and different PFDD variants – one of them is equivalent to a GPN model – to simulate an extended (i.e., dissociated) dislocation in Al with initially pure edge or pure screw character in terms of the disregistry. CAC and discrete forms of PFDD are also employed to calculate the Peierls stress. By conducting comprehensive convergence studies, we quantify the dependence of these measures on time/grid resolution and simulation cell size. Several important but often overlooked differences between PFDD/GPN variants are clarified. Our work sheds light on the advantages and limitations of each method, as well as the path towards enabling them to effectively model complex dislocation processes at larger length scales. Highlights: Disregistry and Peierls stress of a static dislocation in Al are simulated. A phase-field dislocation dynamics method and a concurrent atomistic-continuum method are used. Different PFDD variants are employed and the results are compared. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of plasticity. Volume 129(2020:Jun.)
- Journal:
- International journal of plasticity
- Issue:
- Volume 129(2020:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 129 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 129
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0129-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06
- Subjects:
- Continuum modeling -- Dislocations -- Phase-field method -- Concurrent atomistic–continuum method
Plasticity -- Periodicals
Plasticité -- Périodiques
Plasticity
Periodicals
620.11233 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07496419 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102689 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0749-6419
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.470000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13557.xml