Home medical nutrition during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic – A position paper. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Matras, Przemyslaw; Klek, Stanislaw; Folwarski, Marcin; Zmarzly, Anna; Bartoszewska, Lidia; Cebulski, Wlodzimierz; Jakubczyk, Marlena; Kamocki, Zbigniew; Klepczyk, Katarzyna; Kunecki, Marek; Lawiński, Michal; Majewska, Krystyna; Matczuk, Maciej; Matysiak-Lusnia, Katarzyna; Sadowski, Maciej; Sobocki, Jacek; Sumlet, Magdalena; Szafranski, Waldemar; Szczepanek, Kinga; Urbanowicz, Krystyna; Zoubek-Wojcik, Agata
• Is Part Of: Clinical nutrition ESPEN. Volume 38(2020)
• Page Start: 196
• Page End: 200
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: Home medical nutritition -- COVID-19 -- SARS-CoV-2 -- HAN -- HEN -- Home enteral nutrition -- Home parenteral nutrition; Nutritionally induced diseases -- Periodicals; Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals; 616.39005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.05.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2405-4577

Abstract

Summary: Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a worldwide rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients fed enterally and parenterally at home are exposed to the same risk of infection as the general population, but more prone to complications than others. Therefore the guidance for care-givers and care-takers of these patients is needed. Methods: The literature search identified no relevant systematic reviews or studies on the subject. Therefore a panel of 21 experts from 13 home medical nutrition (HMN) centres in Poland was formed. Twenty-three key issues relevant to the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 in the HMN settings were identified and discussed. Some statements diverge from the available nutrition, surgical or ICU guidelines, some are based on the best available experience. Each topic was discussed and assessed during two Delphi rounds subsequently. Statements were graded strong or weak based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Results: the panel issued 23 statements, all of them were graded strong. Two scored 85.71% agreement, eleven 95.23%, and ten 100%. The topics were: infection control, enrolment to HMN, logistics and patient information. Conclusions: the position paper present pragmatic statements for HMN to be implemented in places without existing protocols for SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. They represent the state of knowledge available at the moment and may change should new evidence occurs.