Assessing the frequency of general fingerprint patterns by fingerprint examiners and novices. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mattijssen, Erwin J.A.T.; Witteman, Cilia L.M.; Berger, Charles E.H.; Stoel, Reinoud D.
• Is Part Of: Forensic science international. Volume 313(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: Fingerprint expertise -- General fingerprint pattern -- Judgment -- Visual statistical learning -- Categorization -- Perceptual learning; Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Chemistry, Forensic -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine légale -- Périodiques; Chimie légale -- Périodiques; Gerechtelijke geneeskunde; Gerechtelijke chemie; Gerechtelijke psychiatrie; Chemistry, Forensic; Medical jurisprudence; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 614.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110347
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0379-0738

Abstract

Highlights: Fingerprint examiners are expected to be able to judge general pattern frequencies. Frequency judgments of fingerprint patterns were not accurate. Examiners outperformed novices when rank ordering general patterns. Examiners seem to have acquired knowledge that novices do not possess. Examiners had difficulty expressing their rarity knowledge quantitatively. Abstract: The rarity of general fingerprint patterns should be taken into account in the assessment of fingerprint evidence to provide a more complete assessment of fingerprint evidence than when only considering the minutiae. This should be done because, the rarer the corresponding pattern, the stronger the support for the hypothesis that the fingermark stems from the same source as the reference fingerprint. Fingerprint examiners' experience should enable them to provide meaningful assessments of the frequencies of these general patterns according to the theories of perceptual learning, exemplar theory of categorization and visual statistical learning. In this study we examined the accuracy of fingerprint examiners' and novices' judgments on the rarity of general fingerprint patterns. We found that fingerprint examiners seem to have acquired some knowledge about the rarity of general patterns, but had difficulty expressing this knowledge quantitatively using a novel sub-classification of general patterns. As a consequence, their judgments were not accurate and they did not perform better on this task than novices. For both participant groups judgments of more common patterns were more accurate. However, examiners did outperform novices in rank ordering general patterns from common to rare. We conclude that our study does not show that fingerprint examiners have expertise in explicitly judging frequencies of novel sub-classifications of general fingerprint patterns, but our results do indicate that the examiners have acquired knowledge about the rarity of patterns that novices do not possess.