Assessment of low-altitude atmospheric turbulence models for aircraft aeroelasticity. (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deskos, Georgios; del Carre, Alfonso; Palacios, Rafael
• Is Part Of: Journal of fluids and structures. Volume 95(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: Atmospheric turbulence -- Gust loads -- Geometrically-nonlinear structures -- Dynamic aeroelasticity -- Flight mechanics -- Large-eddy simulation; Fluid-structure interaction -- Periodicals; Fluid mechanics -- Periodicals; Structural dynamics -- Periodicals; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; 620.106
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102981
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0889-9746

Abstract

Abstract: We investigate the dynamic aeroelastic response of large but slow aircraft in low-altitude atmospheric turbulence. To this end, three turbulence models of increasing fidelity, namely, the one-dimensional von Kármán model, the two-dimensional Kaimal model and full three-dimensional wind fields extracted from large-eddy simulations (LES) are used to simulate ambient turbulence near the ground. Load calculations and flight trajectory predictions are conducted for a representative high-aspect-ratio wing aircraft, using a fully coupled nonlinear flight dynamics/aeroelastic model, when it operates in background atmospheric turbulence generated by the aforementioned models. Comparison of load envelopes and spectral content, on vehicles of varying flexibility, shows strong dependency between the selected turbulence model and aircraft aeroelastic response (e.g. 58% difference in the predicted magnitude of the wing root bending moment between LES and von Kármán models). This is mainly due to the presence of large flow structures at low altitudes that have comparable dimensions to the vehicle, and which despite the relatively small wind speeds within the Earth boundary layer, result in overall high load events for slow-moving vehicles. Results show that one-dimensional models that do not capture those effects provide fairly non-conservative load estimates and are unsuitable for very flexible airframe design.