Giving G a Meaning: An Application of the Bifactor-(S-1) Approach to Realize a More Symptom-Oriented Modeling of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heinrich, Manuel; Zagorscak, Pavle; Eid, Michael; Knaevelsrud, Christine
• Is Part Of: Assessment. Volume 27:Number 7(2020)
• Page Start: 1429
• Page End: 1447
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) -- Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) -- bifactor models -- bifactor-(S-1) model -- symptoms of depression; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; Psychodiagnostics -- Periodicals; Personality tests -- Periodicals; 150.287
• DOI: 10.1177/1073191118803738
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1073-1911

Abstract

The Beck Depression Inventory–II is one of the most frequently used scales to assess depressive burden. Despite many psychometric evaluations, its factor structure is still a topic of debate. An increasing number of articles using fully symmetrical bifactor models have been published recently. However, they all produce anomalous results, which lead to psychometric and interpretational difficulties. To avoid anomalous results, the bifactor-(S-1) approach has recently been proposed as alternative for fitting bifactor structures. The current article compares the applicability of fully symmetrical bifactor models and symptom-oriented bifactor-(S-1) and first-order confirmatory factor analysis models in a large clinical sample ( N = 3, 279) of adults. The results suggest that bifactor-(S-1) models are preferable when bifactor structures are of interest, since they reduce problematic results observed in fully symmetrical bifactor models and give the G factor an unambiguous meaning. Otherwise, symptom-oriented first-order confirmatory factor analysis models present a reasonable alternative.