Utility of a Novel Biomimetic Spine Model in Surgical Education: Case Series of Three Cervicothoracic Kyphotic Deformities. Issue 5 (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bohl, Michael A.; McBryan, Sarah; Kakarla, U. Kumar; Leveque, Jean-Christophe; Sethi, Rajiv
• Is Part Of: Global spine journal. Volume 10:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 583
• Page End: 591
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: cervical spine deformity -- cervical kyphosis -- surgical education -- surgical planning; Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spine -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.73
• DOI: 10.1177/2192568219865182
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2192-5682

Abstract

Study Design: Evaluation of new technology. Objectives: To evaluate the utility of a novel biomimetic spine model as a surgical planning and education resource in the treatment of cervical spine deformities (CSD). Methods: Three patients with CSD were identified and synthetic spine models were manufactured to match the anatomical and biomechanical properties of each patient. Each model underwent 3 phases of surgical correction: maximum correction with no osteotomies performed, with posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) only, and with PCOs and a 3-column osteotomy (3CO). Lateral fluoroscopic films were obtained after each phase of correction for measurement of cervical lordosis. Surgeons were surveyed to obtain subjective feedback on the perceived model utility. Results: Each model began with a kyphotic deformity that was mobile, rigid, or fixed. The mobile model achieved successive lordotic correction with each phase of correction. The rigid and fixed models achieved much less correction with no osteotomies and PCOs only, and the majority of correction with 3COs. Each model predicted with varying, but overall high, accuracy the amount of correction achieved in each patient. The surgeons felt the model had very high utility as a surgical education platform. Conclusions: The models appeared to accurately replicate the gross anatomy and biomechanical performance of the patients' spines. This high fidelity to the individual patient's anatomy, bone quality, and segmental mobility resulted in a custom model that provides an invaluable learning platform for surgical education. These results suggest the models may have utility in surgical planning, but further studies are needed.