Intraoperative Effect of 2D vs 3D Fluoroscopy on Quality of Reduction and Patient-Related Outcome in Calcaneal Fracture Surgery. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Halm, Jens A.; Beerekamp, M. Suzan H.; de Muinck-Keijzer, Robert Jan; Beenen, Ludo F. M.; Maas, Mario; Goslings, J. Carel; Schepers, Tim
• Is Part Of: Foot & ankle international. Volume 41:Number 8(2020)
• Page Start: 954
• Page End: 963
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: trauma -- calcaneus -- fracture -- 3D -- 2D -- fluoroscopy -- imaging -- outcome studies; Foot -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; 617.585
• DOI: 10.1177/1071100720926111
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1071-1007

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy is thought to be advantageous in the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures. The goal of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to investigate the clinical effect of additional intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy on postoperative quality of reduction and fixation and patient-reported outcome as compared to conventional 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy in patients with intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. Methods: Patients were randomized to 3D or conventional 2D fluoroscopy during operative treatment of calcaneal fractures. Primary outcome was the difference in quality of fracture reduction and implant position on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Secondary endpoints included intraoperative corrections (prior to wound closure), complications, and revision surgery (after wound closure). Function and patient-reported outcome were evaluated after surgery and included range of motion, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires, and Kellgren-Lawrence posttraumatic osteoarthritis classification. A total of 102 calcaneal fractures were included in the study in 100 patients. Fifty fractures were randomized to the 3D group and 52 to the 2D group. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in duration of surgery between the groups (2D 125 min vs 3D 147 min; P < .001). After 3D fluoroscopy, a total of 57 intraoperative corrections were performed in 28 patients (56%). The postoperative CT scan revealed an indication for additional revision of reduction or implant position in 69% of the 3D group vs 60% in the 2D fluoroscopy group. At 2 years, there was no difference in number of revision surgery, complications, FAOS, AOFAS score, SF-36 score, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Conclusion: The use of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures prolongs the operative procedures without improving the quality of reduction and fixation. There was no benefit of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy with regard to postoperative complications, quality of life, functional outcome, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: Level I, prospective randomized controlled study.