Dose uncertainty and resolution of polymer gel dosimetry using an MRI guided radiation therapy system's onboard 0.35 T scanner. (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Maraghechi, Borna; Gach, H. Michael; Setianegara, Jufri; Yang, Deshan; Li, H. Harold
• Is Part Of: Physica medica. Volume 73(2020)
• Page Start: 8
• Page End: 12
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: Medical physics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques; Physique -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-1797

Abstract

Highlights: SE and CPMG pulse sequences implemented on ViewRay's onboard 0.35 T MRI scanner. NSA = 16 with a pixel size of 3 × 3 mm 2 or denoising with a pixel size of 1.5 × 1.5 mm 2 . Dose uncertainty and resolution comparable to that with a 1.5 T scanner. Abstract: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners are widely used for 3D gel dosimeters readout. However, limited access to MRI scanners is a challenge in MRI-based gel dosimetry. Recent clinical implementation of MRI-guided radiation therapy machines provides potential opportunities for onboard gel dosimetry using its MRI subsystem. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of gel dosimetry using ViewRay's onboard 0.35 T MRI scanner. A BANG® polymer gel dosimeter was irradiated by three beams of 3 × 3 cm 2 field size. The T2 relaxation rate (R2 ) of the irradiated gel was measured using a Philips 1.5 T Ingenia MRI and a ViewRay 0.35 T onboard MRI and spin-echo pulse sequences. The number of signal averages (NSA) was set to 16 for the ViewRay acquisitions and one for the Philips 1.5 T MRI to achieve similar signal-to-noise ratios. The in-plane spatial resolution was 1.5 × 1.5 mm 2 and the slice thickness was 5 mm. The relative dose uncertainty was obtained using R2 versus dose curves to compare the performance of dosimetry using the two different MRIs and field strengths. The dose uncertainty decreased from 12% at 2 Gy to 3.5% at 7.5 Gy at 1.5 T. The dose uncertainty decreased from 13% at 2 Gy to 4% at 7.5 Gy with NSA = 16 and 3 × 3 mm 2 pixel size, and from 10.5% at 2 Gy to 3.2% at 7.5 Gy with NSA = 16 and denoised R2 maps (1.5 × 1.5 mm 2 pixel size) at 0.35 T. The mean of dose resolution was 0.4 Gy at 1.5 T while the mean of dose resolution was 0.8 Gy and 0.64 Gy at 0.35 T by downsampling and denoising the R2 map, respectively. Therefore, comparable dose uncertainty was achievable using the ViewRay's onboard 0.35 T and Philips 1.5 T MRI scanners. 3D gel dosimetry using onboard low-field MRI scanner provides ViewRay users a 3D high resolution dosimetry option besides film and ionization chamber.