Multi-institutional dosimetric delivery assessment of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery on different treatment platforms. (June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Multi-institutional dosimetric delivery assessment of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery on different treatment platforms. (June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Multi-institutional dosimetric delivery assessment of intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery on different treatment platforms
- Authors:
- Dimitriadis, Alexis
Tsang, Yatman
Thomas, Russell A.S.
Palmer, Antony L.
Eaton, David
Lee, Jonathan
Patel, Rushil
Silvestre Patallo, Ileana
Gouldstone, Clare
Snaith, Julia A.D.
Kirkby, Karen J.
Nisbet, Andrew
Clark, Catharine H. - Abstract:
- Highlights: A multi-institutional end-to-end assessment of radiosurgery dosimetric delivery was performed for 33 plans in 30 participating centres using a variety of treatment platforms. The comparison has highlighted the dosimetric consistency achievable with different delivery platforms. The need for standardisation in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery is highlighted. Abstract: Background and purpose: Assessment of dosimetric accuracy of radiosurgery on different treatment platforms. Material and methods: Thirty-three single fraction treatment plans were assessed at thirty centres using an anthropomorphic head phantom with target and brainstem structures. The target being a single irregular shaped target, ~8 cc, 10 mm from the brainstem. The phantom was "immobilised", scanned, planned and treated following the local protocols. EBT-XD films and alanine pellets were used to measure absolute dose, inside both the target and the brainstem, and compared with TPS predicted dose distributions. Results: PTV alanine measurements from gantry-based linacs showed a median percentage difference to the TPS of 0.65%. Cyberknife (CK) had the highest median difference of 2.3% in comparison to the other platforms. GammaKnife (GK) showed the smallest median of 0.3%. Similar trends were observed in the OAR with alanine measurements showing median percentage differences of1.1%, 2.0% and 0.4%, for gantry-based linacs, CK and GK respectively. All platforms showed comparable gamma passingHighlights: A multi-institutional end-to-end assessment of radiosurgery dosimetric delivery was performed for 33 plans in 30 participating centres using a variety of treatment platforms. The comparison has highlighted the dosimetric consistency achievable with different delivery platforms. The need for standardisation in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery is highlighted. Abstract: Background and purpose: Assessment of dosimetric accuracy of radiosurgery on different treatment platforms. Material and methods: Thirty-three single fraction treatment plans were assessed at thirty centres using an anthropomorphic head phantom with target and brainstem structures. The target being a single irregular shaped target, ~8 cc, 10 mm from the brainstem. The phantom was "immobilised", scanned, planned and treated following the local protocols. EBT-XD films and alanine pellets were used to measure absolute dose, inside both the target and the brainstem, and compared with TPS predicted dose distributions. Results: PTV alanine measurements from gantry-based linacs showed a median percentage difference to the TPS of 0.65%. Cyberknife (CK) had the highest median difference of 2.3% in comparison to the other platforms. GammaKnife (GK) showed the smallest median of 0.3%. Similar trends were observed in the OAR with alanine measurements showing median percentage differences of1.1%, 2.0% and 0.4%, for gantry-based linacs, CK and GK respectively. All platforms showed comparable gamma passing rates between axial and sagittal films. Conclusions: This comparison has highlighted the dosimetric variation between measured and TPS calculated dose for each delivery platform. The results suggest that clinically acceptable agreement with the predicted dose distributions is achievable by all treatment delivery systems. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 147(2020)
- Journal:
- Radiotherapy and oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 147(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 147, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 147
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0147-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 153
- Page End:
- 161
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06
- Subjects:
- Radiosurgery -- Dosimetry -- Audit -- Anthropomorphic phantom -- Alanine -- Radiochromic film
Oncology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.estro.org/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiotherapy-and-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.024 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-8140
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7240.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13477.xml