Power and social distance. (June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Magee, Joe C.
• Is Part Of: Current opinion in psychology. Volume 33(2020)
• Page Start: 33
• Page End: 37
• Publication Date: 2020-06
• Subjects: Psychology -- Periodicals; 150.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-250X

Abstract

Highlights: In dyadic relationships, the goals of the high-power partner are privileged over those of the low-power partner. Higher power reduces attunement and attention to others. Higher power increases the tendency to objectify and dehumanize others. Power increases expressions of dominance and aggression, particularly when the level of situational power diverges from expectations or norms. Greater power limits the detrimental psychological effects of social rejection. Abstract : Magee and Smith (2013) theorized that asymmetric dependence creates asymmetric social distance in power relations, and that high-power individuals feel more distant than their low-power counterparts. I review research consistent with, and in some cases possibly inspired by, the social distance theory of power. Four findings emerge from the review. First, in dyadic relationships, the goals of the high-power partner are privileged over those of the low-power partner. Second, higher power reduces attunement and attention to others and also increases the tendency to objectify and dehumanize others. Third, power increases expressions of interpersonal dominance and aggression, particularly when the level of situational power diverges from expectations or norms. Fourth, greater power reduces the harmful psychological effects of social rejection. I conclude that social distance continues to be a useful factor to consider in making predictions and explaining the psychological effects of power.