Analysing thermal-hydraulic performance and energy efficiency of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with longitudinal flow based on experiment and numerical simulation. (1st July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Analysing thermal-hydraulic performance and energy efficiency of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with longitudinal flow based on experiment and numerical simulation. (1st July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Analysing thermal-hydraulic performance and energy efficiency of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with longitudinal flow based on experiment and numerical simulation
- Authors:
- Li, Nianqi
Chen, Jian
Cheng, Tao
Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír
Varbanov, Petar Sabev
Wang, Qiuwang
Yang, Weisheng
Liu, Xia
Zeng, Min - Abstract:
- Abstract: In this study, diverse baffled longitudinal flow shell-and-tube heat exchangers (STHX) are contrasted with segmental baffle shell-and-tube heat exchanger (SG-STHX). Experimental data are obtained with municipal water served as the working fluid, and the shell-side volume flow rate ranges from 1.79 m 3 /h to 7.42 m 3 /h. The components of the shell-side pressure drop are discussed stand on different flow patterns. The maximum proportion of pressure drop in tube bundle section of rod baffle shell-and-tube heat exchanger (RB-STHX) is 12%, while it has nearly taken up 70% shell-side pressure drop for both SG-STHX and large-and-small hole baffle shell-and-tube heat exchanger (LSHB-STHX). The energy efficiency of three tested STHXs is deliberated from three perspectives, including entropy generation, exergy destruction, and efficiency evaluation criterion. The longitudinal flow pattern performed superior energy efficiency, particularly for RB-STHX with the least irreversible energy loss and the most available work. Grounded on the energy-saving potential of RB-STHX, further numerical simulations on the shell-side thermo-hydraulic performance of RB-STHX are conducted. The nexus between geometrical parameters of RB-STHX and its thermal-hydraulic performance are studied. The thermal-hydraulic performance and energy efficiency discussed in this study support further design and application of longitudinal flow STHX to retain inherent superiorities with advanced performance.Abstract: In this study, diverse baffled longitudinal flow shell-and-tube heat exchangers (STHX) are contrasted with segmental baffle shell-and-tube heat exchanger (SG-STHX). Experimental data are obtained with municipal water served as the working fluid, and the shell-side volume flow rate ranges from 1.79 m 3 /h to 7.42 m 3 /h. The components of the shell-side pressure drop are discussed stand on different flow patterns. The maximum proportion of pressure drop in tube bundle section of rod baffle shell-and-tube heat exchanger (RB-STHX) is 12%, while it has nearly taken up 70% shell-side pressure drop for both SG-STHX and large-and-small hole baffle shell-and-tube heat exchanger (LSHB-STHX). The energy efficiency of three tested STHXs is deliberated from three perspectives, including entropy generation, exergy destruction, and efficiency evaluation criterion. The longitudinal flow pattern performed superior energy efficiency, particularly for RB-STHX with the least irreversible energy loss and the most available work. Grounded on the energy-saving potential of RB-STHX, further numerical simulations on the shell-side thermo-hydraulic performance of RB-STHX are conducted. The nexus between geometrical parameters of RB-STHX and its thermal-hydraulic performance are studied. The thermal-hydraulic performance and energy efficiency discussed in this study support further design and application of longitudinal flow STHX to retain inherent superiorities with advanced performance. Highlights: Only 12% of the total pressure drop in the shell-side of RB-STHX is derived from the tube bundle section. RB-STHX performs 173%∼223% higher EEC than LSHB-STHX with the least irreversible energy loss. Rod baffle shell-and-tube heat exchanger shows the best comprehensive performance. Numerical investigation of the heat transfer enhancement. Factors: tube arrangement, rod shape, baffle arrangement, and baffle number. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy. Volume 202(2020)
- Journal:
- Energy
- Issue:
- Volume 202(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 202, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 202
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0202-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-01
- Subjects:
- Shell-and-tube heat exchanger -- Energy efficiency -- Experimental study -- Numerical study -- Rod baffle
Power resources -- Periodicals
Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals
Energy consumption -- Periodicals
333.7905 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117757 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0360-5442
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.445000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13468.xml