Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening. Issue 2 (May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening. Issue 2 (May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening
- Authors:
- Moshina, N.
Sagstad, S.
Sebuødegård, S.
Waade, G.G.
Gran, E.
Music, J.
Hofvind, S. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: We aimed to investigate the association between breast compression and experienced pain during mammographic screening. Methods: Using a questionnaire, we collected information on pain experienced during mammography from 1155 women screened in Akershus, February–March 2018, as a part of BreastScreen Norway. The questionnaire provided information on pain using a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10) and related factors. Data on compression force (Newton, N), pressure (kilopascal, kPa) and breast characteristics were extracted from the DICOM-header and a breast density software. Log-binomial regression was used to determine the relative risk (RR) of severe versus mild/moderate experienced pain associated with compression parameters, adjusting for breast characteristics and related factors. Results: Mean score of experienced pain was 2.2, whereas 6% of the women reported severe pain (≥7) during the examination. High body mass index (BMI) (≥27.3 kg/m 2 ) was associated with a higher RR of pain scores ≥7 (RR 1.86, 95%CI 1.02–3.36) compared to medium BMI (23.7–27.2 kg/m 2 ). Low compression pressure (4.0–10.2 kPa) was associated with a higher RR of severe pain (RR 2.93, 95%CI 1.39–6.20), compared with medium compression pressure (10.3–13.5 kPa) after adjusting for contact area, age, compressed breast thickness, volumetric breast density and BMI. The risk of severe versus mild/moderate pain (≥7 versus <7) decreased by 2% with increasing compression force (RR 0.98,Abstract: Introduction: We aimed to investigate the association between breast compression and experienced pain during mammographic screening. Methods: Using a questionnaire, we collected information on pain experienced during mammography from 1155 women screened in Akershus, February–March 2018, as a part of BreastScreen Norway. The questionnaire provided information on pain using a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10) and related factors. Data on compression force (Newton, N), pressure (kilopascal, kPa) and breast characteristics were extracted from the DICOM-header and a breast density software. Log-binomial regression was used to determine the relative risk (RR) of severe versus mild/moderate experienced pain associated with compression parameters, adjusting for breast characteristics and related factors. Results: Mean score of experienced pain was 2.2, whereas 6% of the women reported severe pain (≥7) during the examination. High body mass index (BMI) (≥27.3 kg/m 2 ) was associated with a higher RR of pain scores ≥7 (RR 1.86, 95%CI 1.02–3.36) compared to medium BMI (23.7–27.2 kg/m 2 ). Low compression pressure (4.0–10.2 kPa) was associated with a higher RR of severe pain (RR 2.93, 95%CI 1.39–6.20), compared with medium compression pressure (10.3–13.5 kPa) after adjusting for contact area, age, compressed breast thickness, volumetric breast density and BMI. The risk of severe versus mild/moderate pain (≥7 versus <7) decreased by 2% with increasing compression force (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97–1.00). Conclusion: Women reported low levels of pain during mammography. Further knowledge about factors affecting experienced pain is needed to personalize the examination to the individual woman. Implications for practice: Pain in shoulder(s) and/or neck prior to screening should be considered by the radiographers in a practical screening setting. A compression force of 100–140 N and pressure of 10.3–13.5 kPa are acceptable with respect to reported pain during mammography. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiography. Volume 26:Issue 2(2020)
- Journal:
- Radiography
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 2(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0026-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 133
- Page End:
- 139
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05
- Subjects:
- Compression force -- Compression pressure -- Mammography -- Pain -- Breast cancer screening
Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancer -- Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.0757 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10788174 ↗
http://www.radiographyonline.com/ ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/links/toc/radi/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/10788174 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/10788174 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiography/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.003 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1078-8174
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7237.001000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13458.xml