Clinical relevance of Clostridium bacteremia: An 8-year retrospective study. (June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical relevance of Clostridium bacteremia: An 8-year retrospective study. (June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Clinical relevance of Clostridium bacteremia: An 8-year retrospective study
- Authors:
- Stabler, Sarah
Titécat, Marie
Duployez, Claire
Wallet, Frédéric
Loïez, Caroline
Bortolotti, Perrine
Faure, Emmanuel
Faure, Karine
Kipnis, Eric
Dessein, Rodrigue
Le Guern, Rémi - Abstract:
- Abstract: Clostridium spp. are recovered from 25% of the blood culture positive with anaerobes. However, the clinical relevance of Clostridium bacteremia has been controverted in the literature, particularly for C. perfringens . We aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of Clostridium bacteremia, either due to C. perfringens or other Clostridium species, and to identify the risk factors of mortality in these patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to April 2018. All the patients with at least one blood culture positive with any Clostridium species were included. Eighty-one patients with a least one blood culture positive with any Clostridium species were included. Seventy patients (86.4%) fulfilled the criteria for clinically relevant bacteremia. Bacteremia due to C. perfringens tended to be less clinically relevant than other Clostridium species but this was not statistically significant (76% vs 91.2%, P = 0.09). In case of clinically relevant bacteremia, the 30-day mortality rate was 31.4%. In multivariate analysis, adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy was significantly associated with survival ( P = 0.03). In conclusion, bacteremia due to C. perfringens or other Clostridium species is usually clinically relevant. This finding was also supported by an improved survival at 30 days when adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy was administered. Highlights: Clostridium bacteremia is usually clinically relevant. Adequate empiric antimicrobialAbstract: Clostridium spp. are recovered from 25% of the blood culture positive with anaerobes. However, the clinical relevance of Clostridium bacteremia has been controverted in the literature, particularly for C. perfringens . We aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of Clostridium bacteremia, either due to C. perfringens or other Clostridium species, and to identify the risk factors of mortality in these patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to April 2018. All the patients with at least one blood culture positive with any Clostridium species were included. Eighty-one patients with a least one blood culture positive with any Clostridium species were included. Seventy patients (86.4%) fulfilled the criteria for clinically relevant bacteremia. Bacteremia due to C. perfringens tended to be less clinically relevant than other Clostridium species but this was not statistically significant (76% vs 91.2%, P = 0.09). In case of clinically relevant bacteremia, the 30-day mortality rate was 31.4%. In multivariate analysis, adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy was significantly associated with survival ( P = 0.03). In conclusion, bacteremia due to C. perfringens or other Clostridium species is usually clinically relevant. This finding was also supported by an improved survival at 30 days when adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy was administered. Highlights: Clostridium bacteremia is usually clinically relevant. Adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy improves the 30-day survival. Hypothermia is associated with increased mortality. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Anaerobe. Volume 63(2020)
- Journal:
- Anaerobe
- Issue:
- Volume 63(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 63, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0063-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06
- Subjects:
- Clostridium infections -- Anaerobic bacteria -- Blood culture contamination -- Clinical significance
Anaerobic infections -- Periodicals
Anaerobic bacteria -- Periodicals
Bacterial diseases -- Periodicals
Computer network resources
Anaerobic protozoa -- Periodicals
579.3 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10759964 ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1075-9964;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102202 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1075-9964
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0859.882000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13462.xml