Long-Term Follow-up of Skeletally Immature Patients With Physeal-Sparing Combined Extra-/Intra-articular Iliotibial Band Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis. Issue 8 (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sugimoto, Dai; Whited, Amy J.; Brodeur, Jeff J.; Liotta, Elizabeth S.; Williams, Kathryn A.; Kocher, Mininder S.; Micheli, Lyle J.; Heyworth, Benton E.
• Is Part Of: American journal of sports medicine. Volume 48:Issue 8(2020)
• Page Start: 1900
• Page End: 1906
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: Physeal-sparing IT band ACL reconstruction -- kinetics -- kinematics -- skeletal immaturity; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546520927399
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-5465

Abstract

Background: The physeal-sparing iliotibial band (ITB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is a well-established technique for treating skeletally immature patients with ACL rupture. However, the long-term implications of the procedure on the intricacies of kinetic and kinematic function of the knee have not been comprehensively investigated. Purpose: To assess the short-, mid-, and long-term effects of ITB ACLR on kinetic and kinematic parameters of knee functions. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 38 patients who had undergone an ITB ACLR as a skeletally immature child were recruited to participate in a 3-dimensional (3D) motion analysis testing protocol at an institutional injury prevention center between 1 and 20 years after reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were congenital ACL deficiency and any other major knee injury (defined as an injury requiring surgery or rehabilitation >3 months) on either knee. 3D and force plate parameters included in the analysis were knee moment, ground-reaction force, and vertical jump height measured during drop vertical jump and vertical single-limb hop. Paired t tests and equivalency analyses were used to compare the parameters between cases (ITB ACLR limb) and controls (contralateral/nonsurgical limbs). Results: Paired t tests showed no statistically significant differences between limbs, and equivalency analyses confirmed equivalency between limbs for all tested outcome variables. Conclusion: The ITB ACLR appears to restore normal, symmetric, physiologic kinetic and kinematic function in the growing knee by 1 year after reconstruction, with maintenance of normal parameters for up to 20 years.