Factors Affecting Decisions Regarding Terminal Care Locations of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nogami, Noriko; Nakai, Katsuya; Horimoto, Yoshiya; Mizushima, Akio; Saito, Mitsue
• Is Part Of: American journal of hospice & palliative care. Volume 37:Number 10(2020)
• Page Start: 853
• Page End: 858
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: metastatic breast cancer -- palliative care intervention -- palliative care unit -- home palliative care -- advanced care planning -- PCU -- HPC; Hospice care -- Periodicals; Palliative treatment -- Periodicals; 362.175
• DOI: 10.1177/1049909119901154
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-9091

Abstract

Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally incurable, but patients can survive longer than those with other cancer types. Treatment strategies for MBC are complex, and it is difficult to establish evidence of efficacy since symptoms and patient backgrounds vary markedly. Some patients struggle to decide where to receive end-of-life care, despite palliative care intervention, and some die in unexpected places. With the aim of ascertaining the best way to intervene on behalf of patients with end-stage breast cancer, we retrospectively examined interventions provided by our palliative care team. We investigated factors influencing the decision-making processes of patients with MBC regarding end-of-life care locations and where patients actually died. Methods: Clinical records of 44 patients with MBC, all Japanese women, who received palliative care interventions at our hospital, were retrospectively investigated. We examined factors, such as age, possibly impacting decision-making processes regarding the final location and actual place of death. Results: Thirty-five (80%) patients were able to decide where to receive end-of-life care, while the others were not. For these 35 patients, desired locations were the palliative care unit (77%), home palliative care (14%), and the hospital (9%). Age and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were factors influencing patients' decision-making processes ( P = .030 and .044, respectively). Of the 35 patients, 25 (71%) were able to receive end-of-life care at their desired locations. Conclusions: Young patients and those with short RFS struggled with making decisions regarding where to receive end-of-life care. Such patients might benefit from prompt introduction of advanced care planning.