Adhesion of porcelain to three-dimensionally printed and soft milled cobalt chromium. Issue 2 (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barazanchi, Abdullah; Li, Kai Chun; Al-Amleh, Basil; Lyons, Karl; Waddell, J. Neil
• Is Part Of: Journal of prosthodontic research. Volume 64:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 120
• Page End: 127
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: 3D printing -- Laser sintering -- Cobalt chromium -- Soft milling -- Porcelain fused to metal; Prosthodontics -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Prosthodontics -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Computer network resources; 617.6905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.05.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1883-1958

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the adhesion strength and bonding interface of layered porcelain to powdered cobalt–chromium (CoCr) processed by two different computer-aided manufacturing methods. Methods: Sixteen specimens were manufactured from each of Three-dimensionally -printed/laser-sintered (LS) CoCr and milled pre-sintered (SM) CoCr. The specimens were layered with porcelain and 4-point bending was carried out. Nanoindentation was used to calculate changes in elastic modulus and hardness before and after porcelain firing along with adhesion energy. Fracture surface and microstructural changes were examined before and after porcelain firing observed using scanning electron microscopy. Results: The adhesion energy of the LS specimens bonded porcelain were higher than the SM specimens (P < 0.05). Analysis of the fracture surfaces showed a predominantly adhesive mode of failure. Elastic-modulus and hardness of the CoCr specimens increased post porcelain firing. Examination using electron-backscatter diffraction (EBSD) showed a fine grain structure for both manufacturing methods. Significant localized changes in the crystal structure post firing were only observed at the surface of the SM specimens. Conclusions: Both manufacturing methods showed regular microstructures prior to porcelain firing. Laser-sintered CoCr had stronger bonding to porcelain than milled pre-sintered CoCr and was also more stable microstructurally post-ceramic firing. However, both manufacturing methods were deemed to have satisfactory adhesion strength to porcelain. It was also found that increased hardness of CoCr had an inverse relationship with bonding strength. High strength porcelain bonding and stability following multiple ceramic firings indicate suitability for use of these CoCr materials with implant or tooth supported long-span frameworks.