Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT?. Issue 126 (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Long, Chunqin; Xu, Huaxiang; Shen, Qinglin; Zhang, Xianghai; Fan, Bing; Wang, Chuanhong; Zeng, Bingliang; Li, Zicong; Li, Xiaofen; Li, Honglu
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 126(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: GGOs ground-glass opacities -- CT computed tomographic -- HRCT high-resolution CT -- COVID-19 Coronavirus Disease 19 -- HCT hematocrit -- GLU glucose -- WHO World Health Organization -- ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome -- rRT-PCR real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction -- MERS Middle East Respiratory Syndrome; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome -- Coronavirus -- Pneumonia -- Tomography -- X-Ray Computed; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: The COVID-19 outbreak highlights the need for early diagnosis, isolation and treatment The sensitivity of the CT was 97.2%, while the sensitivity of initial rRT-PCR was 83.3%. Patients with typical CT findings but negative rRT-PCR results should be isolated. Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia suspicion, who were examined by both CT and rRT-PCR at initial presentation. The sensitivities of both tests were then compared. For patients with a final confirmed diagnosis, clinical and laboratory data, in addition to CT imaging findings were evaluated. Results: A total of 36 patients were finally diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. Thirty-five patients had abnormal CT findings at presentation, whereas one patient had a normal CT. Using rRT-PCR, 30 patients were tested positive, with 6 cases initially missed. Amongst these 6 patients, 3 became positive in the second rRT-PCR assay(after 2 days, 2 days and 3 days respectively), and the other 3 became positive only in the third round of rRT-PCR tests(after 5 days, 6 days and 8 days respectively). At presentation, CT sensitivity was therefore 97.2%, whereas the sensitivity of initial rRT-PCR was only 83.3%. Conclusion: rRT-PCR may produce initial false negative results. We suggest that patients with typical CT findings but negative rRT-PCR results should be isolated, and rRT-PCR should be repeated to avoid misdiagnosis.