A comparison of first trimester blood pressures obtained at the time of first trimester pre-eclampsia screening and those obtained during prenatal care visits. (May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison of first trimester blood pressures obtained at the time of first trimester pre-eclampsia screening and those obtained during prenatal care visits. (May 2020)
- Main Title:
- A comparison of first trimester blood pressures obtained at the time of first trimester pre-eclampsia screening and those obtained during prenatal care visits
- Authors:
- Seravalli, Viola
Miller, Jena L.
Blitzer, Miriam G.
Baschat, Ahmet A. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To determine if enrollment blood pressures in a study on first trimester preeclampsia prediction significantly differed from those obtained during routine prenatal care visits in the first trimester. Study Design: Women carrying a singleton gestation were prospectively enrolled in a first trimester study on preeclampsia prediction, and had systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) measured at the time of enrollment. Blood pressure was also measured with the same technique by clinic nurses during the routine prenatal visits throughout the first trimester of pregnancy (9–14 weeks). The enrollment-BP (E-BP) and average first trimester-BP (aFT-BP) were compared using a paired samples t -test or Wilcoxon test, as appropriate. Smokers and patients on antihypertensive medications were excluded from the analysis. test. Results: 644 women had prenatal care in the primary study center and met study criteria. The mean gestational age at study enrollment was 12.5 weeks. No significant difference was found between E-SBP and aFT-SBP (p = 0.10). Enrollment DBP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were significantly lower than the aFT- DBP and -MAP (median DPB 67 vs 70 mm Hg and median MAP 83.7 vs 85 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.001). However, the difference was not clinically relevant (3 mmHg for DBP, and 1.3 mmHg for MAP). Conclusions: Blood pressures obtained in a setting of preeclampsia screening are not higher than those obtained during regular prenatal care in theAbstract: Objective: To determine if enrollment blood pressures in a study on first trimester preeclampsia prediction significantly differed from those obtained during routine prenatal care visits in the first trimester. Study Design: Women carrying a singleton gestation were prospectively enrolled in a first trimester study on preeclampsia prediction, and had systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) measured at the time of enrollment. Blood pressure was also measured with the same technique by clinic nurses during the routine prenatal visits throughout the first trimester of pregnancy (9–14 weeks). The enrollment-BP (E-BP) and average first trimester-BP (aFT-BP) were compared using a paired samples t -test or Wilcoxon test, as appropriate. Smokers and patients on antihypertensive medications were excluded from the analysis. test. Results: 644 women had prenatal care in the primary study center and met study criteria. The mean gestational age at study enrollment was 12.5 weeks. No significant difference was found between E-SBP and aFT-SBP (p = 0.10). Enrollment DBP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were significantly lower than the aFT- DBP and -MAP (median DPB 67 vs 70 mm Hg and median MAP 83.7 vs 85 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.001). However, the difference was not clinically relevant (3 mmHg for DBP, and 1.3 mmHg for MAP). Conclusions: Blood pressures obtained in a setting of preeclampsia screening are not higher than those obtained during regular prenatal care in the first trimester. This suggests that the setting in which pre-eclampsia screening is performed is unlikely to be a confounder for blood pressure measurements and the risk assessment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 248(2020)
- Journal:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
- Issue:
- Volume 248(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 248, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 248
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0248-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 77
- Page End:
- 80
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05
- Subjects:
- SBP systolic blood pressure -- DBP diastolic blood pressure -- MAP mean arterial blood pressure -- E-BP enrollment-blood pressure -- aFT-BP average first trimester-blood pressure
Preeclampsia screening -- Blood pressure -- Pregnancy -- First trimester
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
Obstétrique -- Périodiques
Gynécologie -- Périodiques
Reproduction -- Périodiques
Verloskunde
Gynaecologie
Voortplanting (biologie)
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Reproduction
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03012115 ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00282243 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.018 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-2115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13400.xml