Energy and cost estimates for separating and capturing CO2 from CO2/H2O using condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption. (1st July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Energy and cost estimates for separating and capturing CO2 from CO2/H2O using condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption. (1st July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Energy and cost estimates for separating and capturing CO2 from CO2/H2O using condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption
- Authors:
- Lu, Junhui
Cao, Haishan
Li, JunMing - Abstract:
- Abstract: Condensation coupled with pressure swing adsorption (CPSA) and condensation coupled with vacuum swing adsorption (CVSA) were used to separate CO2 from CO2 /H2 O mixtures. Six methods are compared using numerical simulations in terms of the energy consumption, separation efficiency and total annual costs for separating CO2 /H2 O mixtures. The effects of inlet CO2 mole fraction, mass flow rate, and pressure on the total annual cost are also studied. A parametric study shows that the total annual costs of all these methods increase as the CO2 mole fraction and mass flow rate increase and decrease with increasing inlet gas pressure. In addition, for CO2 /H2 O mixtures with inlet pressure of 10 kPa, mass flow rate of 40 kg/s, and CO2 mole fraction of 0.1, the average heat rejection of the CPSA processes is higher than that of the CVSA process. Although the CPSA recovery (90.02%) is much lower than that of CVSA (96.26%), the H2 O remove efficiencies of Adsorption for CPSA and CVSA are very close, because that the remained amount of H2 O before Adsorption is very little. A type of CVSA named CcCVSA has the lowest total annual cost with this being the recommended system. Highlights: Condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption was used to separate CO2 /H2 O mixture. Six separation methods are compared in terms of the energy consumption, separation efficiency and total annual costs. The effects of inlet CO2 composition, mass flow rate, and pressure on theAbstract: Condensation coupled with pressure swing adsorption (CPSA) and condensation coupled with vacuum swing adsorption (CVSA) were used to separate CO2 from CO2 /H2 O mixtures. Six methods are compared using numerical simulations in terms of the energy consumption, separation efficiency and total annual costs for separating CO2 /H2 O mixtures. The effects of inlet CO2 mole fraction, mass flow rate, and pressure on the total annual cost are also studied. A parametric study shows that the total annual costs of all these methods increase as the CO2 mole fraction and mass flow rate increase and decrease with increasing inlet gas pressure. In addition, for CO2 /H2 O mixtures with inlet pressure of 10 kPa, mass flow rate of 40 kg/s, and CO2 mole fraction of 0.1, the average heat rejection of the CPSA processes is higher than that of the CVSA process. Although the CPSA recovery (90.02%) is much lower than that of CVSA (96.26%), the H2 O remove efficiencies of Adsorption for CPSA and CVSA are very close, because that the remained amount of H2 O before Adsorption is very little. A type of CVSA named CcCVSA has the lowest total annual cost with this being the recommended system. Highlights: Condensation coupled with pressure/vacuum swing adsorption was used to separate CO2 /H2 O mixture. Six separation methods are compared in terms of the energy consumption, separation efficiency and total annual costs. The effects of inlet CO2 composition, mass flow rate, and pressure on the total annual cost are studied. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy. Volume 202(2020)
- Journal:
- Energy
- Issue:
- Volume 202(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 202, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 202
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0202-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-01
- Subjects:
- CO2/H2O separation -- CO2 capture -- CO2 storage -- Pressure swing adsorption -- Vacuum swing adsorption
Power resources -- Periodicals
Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals
Energy consumption -- Periodicals
333.7905 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117604 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0360-5442
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.445000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13403.xml