Mortality and Institutionalization After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Parkinson's Disease and Related Conditions. Issue 5 (9th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brown, Lisa; Oswal, Michelle; Samra, Amrit‐Deep; Martin, Hannah; Burch, Nicola; Colby, Joe; Lindahl, Andrea; Skelly, Rob
• Is Part Of: Movement disorders clinical practice. Volume 7:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 509
• Page End: 515
• Publication Date: 2020-06-09
• Subjects: Parkinson's disease -- PEG -- percutaneous endoscopic gastroscopy -- tube feeding -- institutionalization; Movement Disorders; Movement disorders -- Periodicals; Movement disorders; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12971
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2330-1619

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) can facilitate feeding and medication administration in dysphagic patients with Parkinson's disease and related disorders. Information on survival, institutionalization, and complications post PEG might inform feeding decisions. Method: A total of 93 patients with Parkinson's disease and related disorders were identified by review of PEG registers and by searching the administrative databases in 2 large UK university hospitals (2005–2017); 83 case notes were available for retrospective review. Care processes and outcomes were assessed. Results: The following were the diagnoses: 58 (70%) had Parkinson's disease, 10 (12%) had progressive supranuclear palsy, 5 (6%) had multiple system atrophy, 3 (4%) had dementia with Lewy bodies, and 7 (8%) had vascular parkinsonism. The median age was 78 years (interquartile range 72–82); 29 (35%) were women. Care processes included a future care plan in place prior to admission for 18 patients (22%), and PEG was placed during emergency admission in 68 patients (82%). The outcomes included median survival at 422 days; 30‐day mortality rate was 6% (5 patients); and of 56 patients admitted from home, 18 (32%) were discharged to institutions (nursing or care homes). The most common complication was aspiration pneumonia for 18 (22%) of patients. Age, sex, diagnosis, admission type, comorbidities, and place of residence did not predict survival. Discharge to own home and follow‐up by the home enteral feeding team were associated with longer survival. Conclusion: We recommend markers of advanced disease should prompt advanced care planning. Discussions about PEG feeding should include information about post‐PEG survival, complications, and risk of institutionalization. Further research is needed on quality‐of‐life post PEG and ways to reduce aspiration pneumonia. All PEG patients should have nutrition team follow‐up.