Dosimetric comparison of analytic anisotropic algorithm and Acuros XB algorithm in VMAT plans for high-grade glioma. (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Takizawa, Takeshi; Tanabe, Satoshi; Utsunomiya, Satoru; Nakano, Hisashi; Yamada, Takumi; Sakai, Hironori; Ohta, Atsushi; Saito, Hirotake; Nakano, Toshimichi; Abe, Eisuke; Kaidu, Motoki; Aoyama, Hidefumi
• Is Part Of: Physica medica. Volume 73(2020)
• Page Start: 73
• Page End: 82
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: Analytic anisotropic algorithm -- Acuros XB -- High-grade glioma -- Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques; Physique -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-1797

Abstract

Highlights: A dosimetric comparison of AAA and AXB algorithms in VMAT plans for HGG was done. PTV dose differences for both algorithms rose with skull volumes in the PTV. A re-optimized AXB plan's dose difference was lower vs. the re-calculated AXB plan's. Based on film measurement, we recommended that AXB be used in VMAT plans for HGG. Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the dosimetric impact between the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for high-grade glioma (HGG). Methods: We used a heterogeneous phantom to quantify the agreement between the measured and calculated doses from the AAA and from the AXB. We then analyzed 14 patients with HGG treated by VMAT, using the AAA. We newly created AXB plans for each corresponding AAA plan under the following conditions: (1) re-calculation for the same number of monitor units with an identical beam and leaf setup, and (2) re-optimization under the same conditions of dose constraints. The dose coverage for the planning target volume (PTV) was evaluated by dividing the coverage into the skull, air, and soft-tissue regions. Results: Compared to the results obtained with the AAA, the AXB results were in good agreement with the measured profiles. The dose differences in the PTV between the AAA and re-calculated AXB plans were large in the skull region contained in the target. The dose difference in the PTV in both types of plan was significantly correlated with the volume of the skull contained in the target (r = 0.71, p = 0.0042). A re-optimized AXB plan's dose difference was lower vs. the re-calculated AXB plan's. Conclusions: We observed dose differences between the AAA and AXB plans, in particular in the cases in which the skull region of the target was large. Considering the phantom measurement results, the AXB algorithm should be used in VMAT plans for HGG.