Food governance in Territorial Short Food Supply Chains: Different narratives and strategies from Colombia and Spain. (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reina-Usuga, Liliana; de Haro-Giménez, Tomás; Parra-López, Carlos
• Is Part Of: Journal of rural studies. Volume 75(2020)
• Page Start: 237
• Page End: 247
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: Reflexive governance -- Alternative food networks -- Short food supply chain -- Territory -- Q methodology -- Food democracy; Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Country life -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; Land use, Rural -- Planning -- Periodicals; Rural conditions -- Periodicals; Sociologie rurale -- Périodiques; Vie rurale -- Périodiques; Développement rural -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation agricole du -- Planification -- Périodiques; Conditions rurales -- Périodiques; Country life; Land use, Rural -- Planning; Rural conditions; Rural development; Sociology, Rural; Periodicals; 307.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.02.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-0167

Abstract

Abstract: Traditional approaches and debates in Agrifood Governance (AFG) have focused exclusively on the role of market forces and public policies. The emergence of alternative food movements, such as Territorial Short Food Supply Chains (TSFSCs), suggest the need to re-evaluate the role of civil society as a driver of governance mechanisms and a source of innovation and transformation of agrifood systems. This paper analyses the AFG processes that are configured in TSFSCs based on social discourses and coordination mechanisms of agents design. For this, the Q method and an exploratory/descriptive analysis are used, and the cities of Bogotá (Colombia) and Córdoba (Spain) are taken as case studies. Results show five different social discourses around AFG: 1) food activism, 2) development cooperation, 3) market niche, 4) local self-management, and 5) social and ecological awareness. It is also noted that TSFSCs configure a mode of reflexive food governance. Coordination mechanisms of the SFSCs are mainly settled in the social and market sphere, and they are in line with features of governance network. These two governance approaches (reflexive and networked) operate in tandem, with important complementary and synergistic effects that foster food democracy. Highlights: Five social discourses describe food governance of TSFSCs in Bogotá and Córdoba. Food governance mechanisms are trust-based and promote a culture of reciprocity. The governance processes in TSFSCs satisfy the characteristics of reflexive governance and correspond to network governance. TSFSC networks seek to rebalance power relations in Food Systems to promote food security and the well-being of stakeholders. Participatory governance processes are a precondition for more sustainable food systems.