Cervical maturation using mifepristone in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term. (May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cervical maturation using mifepristone in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term. (May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Cervical maturation using mifepristone in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term
- Authors:
- Hcini, Najeh
Jolivet, Anne
Pomar, Leo
Mchirgui, Ali
Maamri, Fatma
Elcadhi, Youssef
Lambert, Veronique
Carles, Gabriel - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral mifepristone use for cervical ripening and the initiation of labor in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term. Study design: We conducted a monocentric, prospective, comparative study on the induction of labor in women with an unfavorable cervix after 37 or more weeks of gestation in the Franck Joly Hospital, French Guiana. The immediate induction of labor by mifepristone was compared to expectant management and the induction of labor with routine cervical ripening agents during two consecutive periods. During the first period, patients received mifepristone (600 mg orally at the moment of enrollment) and were evaluated after 48 h. In the second period, patients did not receive any drugs and were evaluated after 48 h of expectant management. Primary outcomes: Spontaneous labor or a Bishop Score ≥6 within 48 h of mifepristone administration. Secondary outcomes: enrollment-induction to delivery interval, rate of failed induction, doses of prostaglandin used, mode of delivery, requirement of oxytocin augmentation, and neonatal outcomes. Results: This study enrolled 231 women, 108 in the first and 123 in the second period undergoing induced labor at term caused by various obstetric conditions. There were no significant differences between groups for age, body mass index, gravida, parity, the initial Bishop Score, scarred uterus, or post-term pregnancy. There were statisticallyAbstract: Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral mifepristone use for cervical ripening and the initiation of labor in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term. Study design: We conducted a monocentric, prospective, comparative study on the induction of labor in women with an unfavorable cervix after 37 or more weeks of gestation in the Franck Joly Hospital, French Guiana. The immediate induction of labor by mifepristone was compared to expectant management and the induction of labor with routine cervical ripening agents during two consecutive periods. During the first period, patients received mifepristone (600 mg orally at the moment of enrollment) and were evaluated after 48 h. In the second period, patients did not receive any drugs and were evaluated after 48 h of expectant management. Primary outcomes: Spontaneous labor or a Bishop Score ≥6 within 48 h of mifepristone administration. Secondary outcomes: enrollment-induction to delivery interval, rate of failed induction, doses of prostaglandin used, mode of delivery, requirement of oxytocin augmentation, and neonatal outcomes. Results: This study enrolled 231 women, 108 in the first and 123 in the second period undergoing induced labor at term caused by various obstetric conditions. There were no significant differences between groups for age, body mass index, gravida, parity, the initial Bishop Score, scarred uterus, or post-term pregnancy. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning spontaneous labor and/ or a Bishop Score ≥6 within 48 h (p < 10-3) and received doses of misoprostol (p = 0.01). Patients receiving mifepristone were 10 times more likely to be in labor after 48 h of inclusion (RR = 9.98, CI 95 % = [4.47–22.29]). The enrollment-induction to delivery interval was significantly shorter for the mifepristone group (p < 0.001). There were no other differences in mode of delivery, placenta abnormalities or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Mifepristone efficiently induced cervical ripening and labor initiation in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term. It may offer an alternative method to the classic induction especially for patients seeking spontaneous labor. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. Volume 248(2020)
- Journal:
- European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
- Issue:
- Volume 248(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 248, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 248
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0248-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 58
- Page End:
- 62
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05
- Subjects:
- Induction of labor -- Mifepristone -- Spontaneous labor -- Comparative study
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
Obstétrique -- Périodiques
Gynécologie -- Périodiques
Reproduction -- Périodiques
Verloskunde
Gynaecologie
Voortplanting (biologie)
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Reproduction
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03012115 ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00282243 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03012115 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.020 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-2115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13367.xml