Policy cognition is more effective than step tariff in promoting electricity saving behaviour of residents. (April 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Policy cognition is more effective than step tariff in promoting electricity saving behaviour of residents. (April 2020)
- Main Title:
- Policy cognition is more effective than step tariff in promoting electricity saving behaviour of residents
- Authors:
- Wang, Zhaohua
Sun, Yefei
Wang, Bo - Abstract:
- Abstract: As a demand response plan, the step tariff policy for electricity has been fully implemented for several years in China. However, it is not clear whether the step tariff policy for electricity is effective. Therefore, we analysed and compared the effectiveness of step tariff policy from two aspects: step tariff and policy cognition. Specifically, combining macro-scale statistical data and microscopic research data, we constructed a regression discontinuity design and binary response model. First, we tested the correction effect of the step tariff to residential electricity consumption behaviour. Further, combined with cognitive behavioural theory, we analysed the role of policy cognition in the occurrence of electricity saving behaviour. Finally, based on the cognitive evaluation theory, the impact of residents' heterogeneity on their cognitive differences was identified. The specific conclusions are as follows: (1) The step tariff based on the Ramsay strategy cannot effectively correct electricity consumption behaviours as expected. (2) Compared with the step tariff, construction of correct policy cognition has a more significant effect on changing the customary behaviour of electricity consumption. (3) Policy cognition of residents is heterogeneous, and groups with weak policy cognition are accurately identified. Highlights: The tariff policy does not affect residents' electricity consumption behaviour. The impact of policy cognition on electricity consumptionAbstract: As a demand response plan, the step tariff policy for electricity has been fully implemented for several years in China. However, it is not clear whether the step tariff policy for electricity is effective. Therefore, we analysed and compared the effectiveness of step tariff policy from two aspects: step tariff and policy cognition. Specifically, combining macro-scale statistical data and microscopic research data, we constructed a regression discontinuity design and binary response model. First, we tested the correction effect of the step tariff to residential electricity consumption behaviour. Further, combined with cognitive behavioural theory, we analysed the role of policy cognition in the occurrence of electricity saving behaviour. Finally, based on the cognitive evaluation theory, the impact of residents' heterogeneity on their cognitive differences was identified. The specific conclusions are as follows: (1) The step tariff based on the Ramsay strategy cannot effectively correct electricity consumption behaviours as expected. (2) Compared with the step tariff, construction of correct policy cognition has a more significant effect on changing the customary behaviour of electricity consumption. (3) Policy cognition of residents is heterogeneous, and groups with weak policy cognition are accurately identified. Highlights: The tariff policy does not affect residents' electricity consumption behaviour. The impact of policy cognition on electricity consumption behaviour is identified. The problem of how to improve policy cognition among residents have been explored. The research has a reliable theoretical basis in economics and psychology. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy policy. Volume 139(2020)
- Journal:
- Energy policy
- Issue:
- Volume 139(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 139, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 139
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0139-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-04
- Subjects:
- Step tariff -- Policy cognition -- Behaviour -- Electricity consumption
Energy policy -- Periodicals
Politique énergétique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
333.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014215 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111338 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4215
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.720000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 13368.xml