The petrous bone: Ideal substrate in legal medicine?. (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gonzalez, Angéla; Cannet, Catherine; Zvénigorosky, Vincent; Geraut, Annie; Koch, Guillaume; Delabarde, Tania; Ludes, Bertrand; Raul, Jean-Sébastien; Keyser, Christine
• Is Part Of: Forensic science international. Volume 47(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: Petrous bones -- Teeth -- Ancient DNA -- Degraded DNA -- Histology -- STR genotyping; Forensic genetics -- Periodicals; Génétique légale -- Périodiques; Forensic genetics; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 614.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102305
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1872-4973

Abstract

Highlights: The protective shell around the otic capsule preserves it from degradation. The absence of vascularisation prevents exogenous contamination in petrous bones. Degradation in petrous bones varies depending on environmental factors. STR genotyping is more reliable using DNA extracted from petrous bones. Abstract: Over the last few years, palaeogenomic studies of the petrous bone (the densest part of the temporal bone) have shown that it is a source of DNA in both larger quantities and of better quality than other bones. This dense bone around the otic capsule has therefore been called the choice substrate in palaeogenomics. Because the practice of forensic genetics responds to different imperatives, we implemented a study aimed at (i) understanding how and why the petrous bone is an advantageous substrate in ancient DNA studies and (ii) establishing whether it is advantageous in forensic STR typing. We selected 50 individual skeletal remains and extracted DNA from one tooth and one petrous bone from each. We then amplified 24 STR markers commonly used in forensic identification and compared the quality of that amplification using the RFU intensities of the signal as read on the STR profiles. We also performed histological analyses to compare (i) the microscopic structure of a petrous bone and of a tooth and (ii) the microscopic structure of fresh petrous bone and of an archaeological or forensic sample. We show that the RFU intensities read on STR profiles are systematically higher in experiments using DNA extracted from petrous bones rather than teeth. For this reason, we were more likely to obtain a complete STR profile from petrous bone material, increasing the chance of identification in a forensic setting. Histological analyses revealed peculiar microstructural characteristics (tissue organization), unique to the petrous bone, that might explain the good preservation of DNA in that substrate. Therefore, it appears that despite the necessity of analysing longer fragments in forensic STR typing compared to NGS palaeogenomics, the use of petrous bones in forensic genetics could prove valuable, especially in cases involving infants, toothless individuals or very degraded skeletal remains.