Communicating about HPV in the context of head and neck cancer: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Issue 3 (March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Connor, M.; O'Donovan, B.; Waller, J.; Ó Céilleachair, A.; Gallagher, P.; Martin, C.M.; O'Leary, J.; Sharp, L.
• Is Part Of: Patient education and counseling. Volume 103:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 462
• Page End: 472
• Publication Date: 2020-03
• Subjects: Human papillomavirus -- Head and neck cancer -- Healthcare professionals -- Patients -- Communication -- Patient-provider consultations -- Systematic review; Patient education -- Periodicals; Health counseling -- Periodicals; Health education -- Periodicals; Counseling -- Periodicals; Patient Education -- Periodicals; Éducation des patients -- Périodiques; Counseling -- Périodiques; Éducation sanitaire -- Périodiques; 615.5071
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0738-3991

Abstract

Highlights: Wide variation in experiences of discussing HPV in the context of head and neck cancer (HNC). Reliable information about HPV needed for both HCPs and HNC patients. HCPs vary in confidence in HPV discussions, which is related to HPV knowledge. Barriers to discussions include the perception in HCPs that HPV is a sensitive topic. Strategies to facilitate HPV discussions in patient-provider consultations needed. Abstract: Objective: Rising incidence of HPV-positive head and neck cancers (HPV-HNC) means HPV infection is increasingly relevant to patient-provider consultations. We performed a systematic review to examine, in the context of patient-provider HNC consultations: discussions about HPV, attitudes towards discussing HPV and information needs. Methods: We searched Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL + for studies to August 2018. Eligible studies included: HNC healthcare professionals (HCPs) and/or HNC patients investigated HNC patient-provider communication about HPV. Results: Ten studies were identified: six including HCPs and four including HNC patients. HCPs varied in confidence in HPV discussions, which was related to their HPV knowledge. Both HCPs and patients acknowledged the need for reliable HPV information. Factors which facilitated HPV discussions included accessible HPV information for patients and HCPs and good HPV knowledge among HCPs. Barriers included the perception, among HCPs, that HPV was a challenging topic to discuss with patients. Conclusions: Information deficits, communication challenges and barriers to discussing HPV were identified in HNC patient-provider consultations. Practice implications: Appropriate HPV information is needed for HCPs and patients. Professional development initiatives which increase HCPs' HPV knowledge and build their communication skills would be valuable.